From: Wolfgang Wander <wwc@rentec.com>
To: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
Cc: 'Wolfgang Wander' <wwc@rentec.com>,
'Andrew Morton' <akpm@osdl.org>,
mingo@elte.hu, arjanv@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoiding mmap fragmentation - clean rev
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 09:05:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17035.15766.660660.326331@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200505172228.j4HMSkg28528@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
Chen, Kenneth W writes:
> This patch tries to solve address space fragmentation issue brought
> up by Wolfgang where fragmentation is so severe that application
> would fail on 2.6 kernel. Looking a bit deep into the issue, we
> found that a lot of fragmentation were caused by suboptimal algorithm
> in the munmap code path. For example, as people pointed out that
> when a series of munmap occurs, the free_area_cache would point to
> last vma that was freed, ignoring its surrounding and not performing
> any coalescing at all, thus artificially create more holes in the
> virtual address space than necessary. However, all the information
> needed to perform coalescing are actually already there. This patch
> put that data in use so we will prevent artificial fragmentation.
>
> This patch covers both bottom-up and top-down topology. For bottom-up
> topology, free_area_cache points to prev->vm_end. And for top-down,
> free_area_cache points to next->vm_start. The results are very promising,
> it passes the test case that Wolfgang posted and I have tested it on a
> variety of x86, x86_64, ia64 machines.
>
> Please note, this patch completely obsoletes previous patch that
> Wolfgang posted and should completely retain the performance benefit
> of free_area_cache and at the same time preserving fragmentation to
> minimum.
>
> Andrew, please consider for -mm testing. Thanks.
>
I do like it for its simplicity. My test case is perfectly happy
with it and I'm all for including this one rather than my patch
as a fix.
Please note though that this patch only seems to address the issue of
fragmentation due to unmapping.
The other issue, namely that the old code (2.4) and my patch tend to
fill holes in near the base with small requests thus leaving larger
holes far from the base uncluttered is not addressed. Here as in the
orginal 2.6 code we will distribute small request equally in all
available holes which will close larger holes unnessecarily.
I'll rerun my large scale applications that caused us to detect the
fragmentation issues in the first place. If they fail (which I don't
believe) we could maybe combine the two approaches to get a better
cache pointer for the unmap case and a way to unclutter the address
space via the cached_hole_size.
Wolfgang
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-18 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E4BA51C8E4E9634993418831223F0A49291F06E1@scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com>
2005-05-17 22:28 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-05-18 7:28 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-05-18 7:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-05-18 7:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-05-18 13:05 ` Wolfgang Wander [this message]
2005-05-18 15:47 ` Wolfgang Wander
2005-05-18 16:18 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-05-18 17:16 ` Wolfgang Wander
2005-05-18 17:57 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-05-19 18:38 ` Wolfgang Wander
2005-05-19 22:54 ` Andrew Morton
2005-05-20 2:02 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-05-20 23:51 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-05-23 18:25 ` Wolfgang Wander
2005-05-26 17:32 ` Wolfgang Wander
2005-05-26 17:44 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-05-20 3:10 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-05-20 12:39 ` Wolfgang Wander
2005-05-20 2:14 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-05-20 12:47 ` Wolfgang Wander
2005-05-25 7:30 linux
2005-05-27 16:37 Chen, Kenneth W
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17035.15766.660660.326331@gargle.gargle.HOWL \
--to=wwc@rentec.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox