From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] arm64/mm: Refactor __set_ptes() and __ptep_get_and_clear()
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 11:54:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <169f2d13-8374-48b2-8af1-db412f283e5b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202503061237.QurSXHSC-lkp@intel.com>
On 06/03/2025 05:08, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
> [also build test ERROR on v6.14-rc5 next-20250305]
> [cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core akpm-mm/mm-everything arm-perf/for-next/perf]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ryan-Roberts/arm64-hugetlb-Cleanup-huge_pte-size-discovery-mechanisms/20250304-230647
> base: linus/master
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250304150444.3788920-5-ryan.roberts%40arm.com
> patch subject: [PATCH v3 04/11] arm64/mm: Refactor __set_ptes() and __ptep_get_and_clear()
> config: arm64-randconfig-001-20250305 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250306/202503061237.QurSXHSC-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 15.0.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 8dfdcc7b7bf66834a761bd8de445840ef68e4d1a)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250306/202503061237.QurSXHSC-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503061237.QurSXHSC-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> In file included from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:12:
> In file included from include/linux/ftrace.h:10:
> In file included from include/linux/trace_recursion.h:5:
> In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
> In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
> In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/hardirq.h:17:
> In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
> In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
> In file included from include/linux/io.h:14:
> In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h:12:
> In file included from include/linux/pgtable.h:6:
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:639:7: error: duplicate case value '536870912'
> case PUD_SIZE:
> ^
> include/asm-generic/pgtable-nopud.h:20:20: note: expanded from macro 'PUD_SIZE'
> #define PUD_SIZE (1UL << PUD_SHIFT)
> ^
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:636:7: note: previous case defined here
> case PMD_SIZE:
> ^
> include/asm-generic/pgtable-nopmd.h:22:20: note: expanded from macro 'PMD_SIZE'
> #define PMD_SIZE (1UL << PMD_SHIFT)
> ^
> In file included from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:12:
> In file included from include/linux/ftrace.h:10:
> In file included from include/linux/trace_recursion.h:5:
> In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
> In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
> In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/hardirq.h:17:
> In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
> In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
> In file included from include/linux/io.h:14:
> In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h:12:
> In file included from include/linux/pgtable.h:6:
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:1303:7: error: duplicate case value '536870912'
> case PUD_SIZE:
> ^
> include/asm-generic/pgtable-nopud.h:20:20: note: expanded from macro 'PUD_SIZE'
> #define PUD_SIZE (1UL << PUD_SHIFT)
> ^
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:1300:7: note: previous case defined here
> case PMD_SIZE:
> ^
> include/asm-generic/pgtable-nopmd.h:22:20: note: expanded from macro 'PMD_SIZE'
> #define PMD_SIZE (1UL << PMD_SHIFT)
> ^
> 2 errors generated.
> make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:102: arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1 shuffle=4064171735
> make[3]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> make[2]: *** [Makefile:1264: prepare0] Error 2 shuffle=4064171735
> make[2]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> make[1]: *** [Makefile:251: __sub-make] Error 2 shuffle=4064171735
> make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> make: *** [Makefile:251: __sub-make] Error 2 shuffle=4064171735
> make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
>
>
> vim +/536870912 +639 arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>
> 626
> 627 static inline void set_ptes_anysz(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte,
> 628 unsigned int nr, unsigned long pgsize)
> 629 {
> 630 unsigned long stride = pgsize >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> 631
> 632 switch (pgsize) {
> 633 case PAGE_SIZE:
> 634 page_table_check_ptes_set(mm, ptep, pte, nr);
> 635 break;
> 636 case PMD_SIZE:
> 637 page_table_check_pmds_set(mm, (pmd_t *)ptep, pte_pmd(pte), nr);
> 638 break;
> > 639 case PUD_SIZE:
> 640 page_table_check_puds_set(mm, (pud_t *)ptep, pte_pud(pte), nr);
> 641 break;
Looks like this needs to be wrapped in `#ifndef __PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED`. This
failing config folds the PMD so PMD_SIZE and PUD_SIZE are the same.
Given there are now 2 kernel robot reports, I'll respin the series next week,
giving time for any interim review comments.
Thanks,
Ryan
> 642 default:
> 643 VM_WARN_ON(1);
> 644 }
> 645
> 646 __sync_cache_and_tags(pte, nr * stride);
> 647
> 648 for (;;) {
> 649 __check_safe_pte_update(mm, ptep, pte);
> 650 __set_pte(ptep, pte);
> 651 if (--nr == 0)
> 652 break;
> 653 ptep++;
> 654 pte = pte_advance_pfn(pte, stride);
> 655 }
> 656 }
> 657
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-06 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-04 15:04 [PATCH v3 00/11] Perf improvements for hugetlb and vmalloc on arm64 Ryan Roberts
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] arm64: hugetlb: Cleanup huge_pte size discovery mechanisms Ryan Roberts
2025-04-03 20:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-04 3:03 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] arm64: hugetlb: Refine tlb maintenance scope Ryan Roberts
2025-04-03 20:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-04 3:50 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] mm/page_table_check: Batch-check pmds/puds just like ptes Ryan Roberts
2025-03-26 14:48 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-03-26 14:54 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-03 20:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] arm64/mm: Refactor __set_ptes() and __ptep_get_and_clear() Ryan Roberts
2025-03-06 5:08 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-06 11:54 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2025-04-14 16:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] arm64: hugetlb: Use set_ptes_anysz() and ptep_get_and_clear_anysz() Ryan Roberts
2025-03-05 16:00 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-05 16:32 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-03 20:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] arm64/mm: Hoist barriers out of set_ptes_anysz() loop Ryan Roberts
2025-04-03 20:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-04 4:11 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] mm/vmalloc: Warn on improper use of vunmap_range() Ryan Roberts
2025-03-27 13:05 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] mm/vmalloc: Gracefully unmap huge ptes Ryan Roberts
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] arm64/mm: Support huge pte-mapped pages in vmap Ryan Roberts
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] mm/vmalloc: Enter lazy mmu mode while manipulating vmalloc ptes Ryan Roberts
2025-03-27 13:06 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-04-03 20:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-04 4:54 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] arm64/mm: Batch barriers when updating kernel mappings Ryan Roberts
2025-04-04 6:02 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-14 17:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-14 18:28 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-15 10:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-15 17:28 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-03-27 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] Perf improvements for hugetlb and vmalloc on arm64 Uladzislau Rezki
2025-03-27 13:46 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-14 13:56 ` Ryan Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=169f2d13-8374-48b2-8af1-db412f283e5b@arm.com \
--to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox