From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: ankita@nvidia.com, jgg@nvidia.com, maz@kernel.org,
oliver.upton@linux.dev, james.morse@arm.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
reinette.chatre@intel.com, surenb@google.com,
stefanha@redhat.com, brauner@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
yi.l.liu@intel.com, ardb@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
andreyknvl@gmail.com, wangjinchao@xfusion.com, gshan@redhat.com,
shahuang@redhat.com, ricarkol@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
lpieralisi@kernel.org, rananta@google.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
linus.walleij@linaro.org, bhe@redhat.com
Cc: aniketa@nvidia.com, cjia@nvidia.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
targupta@nvidia.com, vsethi@nvidia.com, acurrid@nvidia.com,
apopple@nvidia.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com, danw@nvidia.com,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, mochs@nvidia.com, zhiw@nvidia.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] mm: introduce new flag to indicate wc safe
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 14:13:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <165363ba-d6cc-47a7-ab2a-d3a27a42f739@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240211174705.31992-3-ankita@nvidia.com>
On 11.02.24 18:47, ankita@nvidia.com wrote:
> From: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
>
> Generalizing S2 setting from DEVICE_nGnRE to NormalNc for non PCI
> devices may be problematic. E.g. GICv2 vCPU interface, which is
> effectively a shared peripheral, can allow a guest to affect another
> guest's interrupt distribution. The issue may be solved by limiting
> the relaxation to mappings that have a user VMA. Still there is
> insufficient information and uncertainity in the behavior of
s/uncertainity/uncertainty/
> non PCI drivers.
>
> Add a new flag VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED to indicate KVM that the device
> is WC capable and these S2 changes can be extended to it. KVM can use
> this flag to activate the code.
>
MM people will stumble only over this commit at some point, looking for
details. It might make sense to add a bit more details on the underlying
problem (user space tables vs. stage-1 vs. stage-2) and why we want to
have a different mapping in user space compared to stage-1.
Then, describe that the VMA flag was found to be the simplest and
cleanest way to communicate this information from VFIO to KVM.
> Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index f5a97dec5169..59576e56c58b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -391,6 +391,20 @@ extern unsigned int kobjsize(const void *objp);
> # define VM_UFFD_MINOR VM_NONE
> #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_MINOR */
>
> +/*
> + * This flag is used to connect VFIO to arch specific KVM code. It
> + * indicates that the memory under this VMA is safe for use with any
> + * non-cachable memory type inside KVM. Some VFIO devices, on some
> + * platforms, are thought to be unsafe and can cause machine crashes
> + * if KVM does not lock down the memory type.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> +#define VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED_BIT 39
> +#define VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED BIT(VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED_BIT)
> +#else
> +#define VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED VM_NONE
> +#endif
> +
> /* Bits set in the VMA until the stack is in its final location */
> #define VM_STACK_INCOMPLETE_SETUP (VM_RAND_READ | VM_SEQ_READ | VM_STACK_EARLY)
>
It's not perfect (very VFIO <-> KVM specific right now, VMA flags feel a
bit wrong), but it certainly easier and cleaner than any alternatives I
could think of.
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-12 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-11 17:47 [PATCH v7 0/4] kvm: arm64: allow the VM to select DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC for IO memory ankita
2024-02-11 17:47 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] kvm: arm64: introduce new flag for non-cacheable " ankita
2024-02-11 17:47 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] mm: introduce new flag to indicate wc safe ankita
2024-02-12 13:13 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-02-13 3:41 ` Ankit Agrawal
2024-02-11 17:47 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] kvm: arm64: set io memory s2 pte as normalnc for vfio pci device ankita
2024-02-11 17:47 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] vfio: convey kvm that the vfio-pci device is wc safe ankita
2024-02-12 13:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-02-12 17:05 ` Alex Williamson
2024-02-12 17:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-12 17:27 ` Alex Williamson
2024-02-13 1:59 ` Ankit Agrawal
2024-02-12 10:26 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] kvm: arm64: allow the VM to select DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC for IO memory David Hildenbrand
2024-02-12 12:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-12 13:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-02-12 20:24 ` Oliver Upton
2024-02-13 2:29 ` Ankit Agrawal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=165363ba-d6cc-47a7-ab2a-d3a27a42f739@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=acurrid@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=aniketa@nvidia.com \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
--cc=danw@nvidia.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=wangjinchao@xfusion.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox