linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@suse.de>
To: "Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Wu Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	"Jaegeuk Kim" <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, "Chao Yu" <chao@kernel.org>,
	"Jeff Layton" <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	"Ilya Dryomov" <idryomov@gmail.com>,
	"Trond Myklebust" <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
	"Anna Schumaker" <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
	"Ryusuke Konishi" <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	"Philipp Reisner" <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>,
	"Lars Ellenberg" <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>,
	"Paolo Valente" <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
	"Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, "linux-mm" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org,
	"Linux NFS list" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	"Ext4" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] MM: improve cleanup when ->readpages doesn't process all pages.
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2022 13:23:14 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <164636059432.13165.6442580674358743838@noble.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpegs=DhCO62EFV0Q_i2fmqJnziJy1t4itP9deS=FuWEA=TQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 02 Mar 2022, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 at 04:18, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> > If ->readpages doesn't process all the pages, then it is best to act as
> > though they weren't requested so that a subsequent readahead can try
> > again.
> > So:
> >   - remove any 'ahead' pages from the page cache so they can be loaded
> >     with ->readahead() rather then multiple ->read()s
> >   - update the file_ra_state to reflect the reads that were actually
> >     submitted.
> >
> > This allows ->readpages() to abort early due e.g.  to congestion, which
> > will then allow us to remove the inode_read_congested() test from
> > page_Cache_async_ra().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> > ---
> >  mm/readahead.c |   19 +++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/readahead.c b/mm/readahead.c
> > index 73b2bc5302e0..8a97bd408cf6 100644
> > --- a/mm/readahead.c
> > +++ b/mm/readahead.c
> > @@ -104,7 +104,13 @@
> >   * for necessary resources (e.g.  memory or indexing information) to
> >   * become available.  Pages in the final ``async_size`` may be
> >   * considered less urgent and failure to read them is more acceptable.
> > - * They will eventually be read individually using ->readpage().
> > + * In this case it is best to use delete_from_page_cache() to remove the
> > + * pages from the page cache as is automatically done for pages that
> > + * were not fetched with readahead_page().  This will allow a
> > + * subsequent synchronous read ahead request to try them again.  If they
> > + * are left in the page cache, then they will be read individually using
> > + * ->readpage().
> > + *
> >   */
> >
> >  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > @@ -226,8 +232,17 @@ static void read_pages(struct readahead_control *rac, struct list_head *pages,
> >
> >         if (aops->readahead) {
> >                 aops->readahead(rac);
> > -               /* Clean up the remaining pages */
> > +               /*
> > +                * Clean up the remaining pages.  The sizes in ->ra
> > +                * maybe be used to size next read-ahead, so make sure
> > +                * they accurately reflect what happened.
> > +                */
> >                 while ((page = readahead_page(rac))) {
> > +                       rac->ra->size -= 1;
> > +                       if (rac->ra->async_size > 0) {
> > +                               rac->ra->async_size -= 1;
> > +                               delete_from_page_cache(page);
> > +                       }
> 
> Does the  above imply that filesystem should submit at least ra->size
> pages, regardless of congestion?

   ra->size - ra_async_size 
pages should be submitted reguardless of congestion.

NeilBrown



  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-04  3:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-22  3:17 [PATCH 00/11] Remove remaining parts of congestion tracking code NeilBrown
2022-02-22  3:17 ` [PATCH 04/11] fuse: remove reliance on bdi congestion NeilBrown
2022-03-01 13:27   ` Miklos Szeredi
2022-03-04  2:42     ` NeilBrown
2022-02-22  3:17 ` [PATCH 08/11] Remove bdi_congested() and wb_congested() and related functions NeilBrown
2022-02-22  3:17 ` [PATCH 06/11] ceph: remove reliance on bdi congestion NeilBrown
2022-02-23 15:43   ` Jeff Layton
2022-02-24  5:41     ` NeilBrown
2022-02-24 11:30       ` Jeff Layton
2022-03-04  2:47         ` NeilBrown
2022-03-04 11:14           ` Jeff Layton
2022-02-22  3:17 ` [PATCH 09/11] f2fs: replace congestion_wait() calls with io_schedule_timeout() NeilBrown
2022-02-22  3:17 ` [PATCH 03/11] MM: improve cleanup when ->readpages doesn't process all pages NeilBrown
2022-03-01 13:00   ` Miklos Szeredi
2022-03-04  2:23     ` NeilBrown [this message]
2022-02-22  3:17 ` [PATCH 02/11] MM: document and polish read-ahead code NeilBrown
2022-02-22  3:17 ` [PATCH 05/11] nfs: remove reliance on bdi congestion NeilBrown
2022-02-22  3:17 ` [PATCH 01/11] DOC: convert 'subsection' to 'section' in gfp.h NeilBrown
2022-02-22  3:17 ` [PATCH 11/11] Remove congestion tracking framework NeilBrown
2022-02-22  3:17 ` [PATCH 10/11] block/bfq-iosched.c: use "false" rather than "BLK_RW_ASYNC" NeilBrown
2022-02-22  3:17 ` [PATCH 07/11] Remove inode_congested() NeilBrown
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-02-10  5:37 [PATCH 00/11] Remove remaining parts of congestion tracking code NeilBrown
2022-02-10  5:37 ` [PATCH 03/11] MM: improve cleanup when ->readpages doesn't process all pages NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=164636059432.13165.6442580674358743838@noble.neil.brown.name \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \
    --cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox