From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: linux-cachefs@redhat.com
Cc: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
JeffleXu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 68/68] 9p, afs, ceph, cifs, nfs: Use current_is_kswapd() rather than gfpflags_allow_blocking()
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 23:31:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <164021590773.640689.16777975200823659231.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <164021479106.640689.17404516570194656552.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
In 9p, afs ceph, cifs and nfs, gfpflags_allow_blocking() (which wraps a
test for __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM being set) is used to determine if
->releasepage() should wait for the completion of a DIO write to fscache
with something like:
if (folio_test_fscache(folio)) {
if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp) || !(gfp & __GFP_FS))
return false;
folio_wait_fscache(folio);
}
Instead, current_is_kswapd() should be used instead.
Note that this is based on a patch originally by Zhaoyang Huang[1]. In
addition to extending it to the other network filesystems and putting it on
top of my fscache rewrite, it also needs to include linux/swap.h in a bunch
of places. Can current_is_kswapd() be moved to linux/mm.h?
Originally-signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
Co-developed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
cc: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>
cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com
cc: v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1638952658-20285-1-git-send-email-huangzhaoyang@gmail.com/ [1]
---
fs/9p/vfs_addr.c | 3 ++-
fs/afs/file.c | 3 ++-
fs/ceph/addr.c | 3 ++-
fs/cifs/file.c | 2 +-
fs/nfs/fscache.h | 3 ++-
5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_addr.c b/fs/9p/vfs_addr.c
index f3f349f460e5..c72e9f8f5f32 100644
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_addr.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_addr.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/pagemap.h>
#include <linux/idr.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/swap.h>
#include <linux/uio.h>
#include <linux/netfs.h>
#include <net/9p/9p.h>
@@ -143,7 +144,7 @@ static int v9fs_release_page(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp)
return 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_9P_FSCACHE
if (folio_test_fscache(folio)) {
- if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp) || !(gfp & __GFP_FS))
+ if (current_is_kswapd() || !(gfp & __GFP_FS))
return 0;
folio_wait_fscache(folio);
}
diff --git a/fs/afs/file.c b/fs/afs/file.c
index 572063dad0b3..5b98db127a1b 100644
--- a/fs/afs/file.c
+++ b/fs/afs/file.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/gfp.h>
#include <linux/task_io_accounting_ops.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/swap.h>
#include <linux/netfs.h>
#include "internal.h"
@@ -517,7 +518,7 @@ static int afs_releasepage(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp)
* elected to wait */
#ifdef CONFIG_AFS_FSCACHE
if (folio_test_fscache(folio)) {
- if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp) || !(gfp & __GFP_FS))
+ if (current_is_kswapd() || !(gfp & __GFP_FS))
return false;
folio_wait_fscache(folio);
}
diff --git a/fs/ceph/addr.c b/fs/ceph/addr.c
index e836f8f1d4f8..b3d9459c9bbd 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/addr.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/addr.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#include <linux/backing-dev.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/swap.h>
#include <linux/pagemap.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/pagevec.h>
@@ -174,7 +175,7 @@ static int ceph_releasepage(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp)
return 0;
if (PageFsCache(page)) {
- if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp) || !(gfp & __GFP_FS))
+ if (current_is_kswapd() || !(gfp & __GFP_FS))
return 0;
wait_on_page_fscache(page);
}
diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
index 22b66ce10115..d872f6fe8e7d 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -4809,7 +4809,7 @@ static int cifs_release_page(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp)
if (PagePrivate(page))
return 0;
if (PageFsCache(page)) {
- if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp) || !(gfp & __GFP_FS))
+ if (current_is_kswapd() || !(gfp & __GFP_FS))
return false;
wait_on_page_fscache(page);
}
diff --git a/fs/nfs/fscache.h b/fs/nfs/fscache.h
index e0220fc40366..25a5c0f82392 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/fscache.h
+++ b/fs/nfs/fscache.h
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#ifndef _NFS_FSCACHE_H
#define _NFS_FSCACHE_H
+#include <linux/swap.h>
#include <linux/nfs_fs.h>
#include <linux/nfs_mount.h>
#include <linux/nfs4_mount.h>
@@ -52,7 +53,7 @@ extern void __nfs_readpage_to_fscache(struct inode *, struct page *);
static inline int nfs_fscache_release_page(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp)
{
if (PageFsCache(page)) {
- if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp) || !(gfp & __GFP_FS))
+ if (current_is_kswapd() || !(gfp & __GFP_FS))
return false;
wait_on_page_fscache(page);
fscache_note_page_release(nfs_i_fscache(page->mapping->host));
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-22 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-22 23:13 [PATCH v4 00/68] fscache, cachefiles: Rewrite David Howells
2021-12-22 23:31 ` David Howells [this message]
2022-01-04 10:50 ` Jeff Layton
2022-01-06 18:19 ` [Linux-cachefs] " Marc Dionne
2022-01-06 18:29 ` Jeff Layton
2022-01-10 11:21 ` Dominique Martinet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=164021590773.640689.16777975200823659231.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
--cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
--cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox