From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org
Cc: lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
mhocko@suse.com, npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests/mm: uffd-stress fixes
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 13:52:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1634f29f-81a6-46f7-86d4-c9eac953d4f1@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250826070705.53841-1-dev.jain@arm.com>
On 26/08/25 12:37 pm, Dev Jain wrote:
> This patchset ensures that the number of hugepages is correctly set in the
> system so that the uffd-stress test does not fail due to the racy nature of
> the test. Patch 1 corrects the hugepage constraint in the run_vmtests.sh
> script, whereas patch 2 corrects the constraint in the test itself.
>
> Dev Jain (2):
> selftests/mm/uffd-stress: Make test operate on less hugetlb memory
> selftests/mm/uffd-stress: Stricten constraint on free hugepages before
> the test
>
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Hi Andrew,
I wanted to make a v2 of this series to replace 10 with min(32, nrcpus - 1)
(see computation of nr_parallel in uffd-stress.c) but I see that it has
been pulled into mm-new, and on top of that, the following patch makes
things complicated to just revert my commits in mm-new and make v2 on top of that -
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250830033424.8C44FC4CEF0@smtp.kernel.org/
So shall I just send a new separate patch based off mm-new?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-08 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-26 7:07 Dev Jain
2025-08-26 7:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] selftests/mm/uffd-stress: Make test operate on less hugetlb memory Dev Jain
2025-08-28 14:50 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-08-29 11:09 ` Dev Jain
2025-08-26 7:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/mm/uffd-stress: Stricten constraint on free hugepages before the test Dev Jain
2025-09-08 8:22 ` Dev Jain [this message]
2025-09-09 2:02 ` [PATCH 0/2] selftests/mm: uffd-stress fixes Andrew Morton
2025-09-09 3:46 ` Dev Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1634f29f-81a6-46f7-86d4-c9eac953d4f1@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox