linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@suse.de>
To: "Uladzislau Rezki" <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: "Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"Linux Memory Management List" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	"LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Ilya Dryomov" <idryomov@gmail.com>,
	"Jeff Layton" <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] mm/vmalloc: add support for __GFP_NOFAIL
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 21:13:35 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <163481121586.17149.4002493290882319236@noble.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211020192430.GA1861@pc638.lan>

On Thu, 21 Oct 2021, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 05:00:28PM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed 20-10-21 16:29:14, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 4:06 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > As I've said I am OK with either of the two. Do you or anybody have any
> > > > > preference? Without any explicit event to wake up for neither of the two
> > > > > is more than just an optimistic retry.
> > > > >
> > > > From power perspective it is better to have a delay, so i tend to say
> > > > that delay is better.
> > >
> > > I am a terrible random number generator. Can you give me a number
> > > please?
> > >
> > Well, we can start from one jiffy so it is one timer tick: schedule_timeout(1)
> > 
> A small nit, it is better to replace it by the simple msleep() call: msleep(jiffies_to_msecs(1));

I disagree.  I think schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1) is the best
wait to sleep for 1 ticl

msleep() contains
  timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(msecs) + 1;
and both jiffies_to_msecs and msecs_to_jiffies might round up too.
So you will sleep for at least twice as long as you asked for, possible
more.

NeilBrown


> 
> --
> Vlad Rezki
> 
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-21 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-18 11:47 [RFC 0/3] extend vmalloc support for constrained allocations Michal Hocko
2021-10-18 11:47 ` [RFC 1/3] mm/vmalloc: alloc GFP_NO{FS,IO} for vmalloc Michal Hocko
2021-10-19  0:44   ` NeilBrown
2021-10-19  6:59     ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-18 11:47 ` [RFC 2/3] mm/vmalloc: add support for __GFP_NOFAIL Michal Hocko
2021-10-18 16:48   ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-19 11:06   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-10-19 11:52     ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-19 19:46       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-10-20  8:25         ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-20  9:18           ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-20 13:54           ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-10-20 14:06             ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-20 14:29               ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-10-20 14:53                 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-20 15:00                   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-10-20 19:24                     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-10-21  8:56                       ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-21 10:13                       ` NeilBrown [this message]
2021-10-21 10:27                         ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-21 10:40                           ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-10-21 22:49                             ` NeilBrown
2021-10-22  8:18                               ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-25  9:48                               ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-10-25 11:20                                 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-25 14:30                                   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-10-25 14:56                                     ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-25 23:50                                 ` NeilBrown
2021-10-26  7:16                                   ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-26 10:24                                     ` NeilBrown
2021-10-26 14:25                                       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-10-26 14:43                                         ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-26 15:40                                           ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-10-20  8:25   ` [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: be more explicit about supported gfp flags Michal Hocko
2021-10-18 11:47 ` [RFC 3/3] mm: allow !GFP_KERNEL allocations for kvmalloc Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=163481121586.17149.4002493290882319236@noble.neil.brown.name \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox