From: Sayali Patil <sayalip@linux.ibm.com>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/15] selftest/mm: align memory size to huge page size in hugepage-mremap test
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 20:00:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <162ca3d6-c5b6-4c36-8e20-313fcc4e3eb4@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15910BAF-8D1D-4EAA-85A6-2E4CD3700513@nvidia.com>
On 07/04/26 20:27, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 6 Apr 2026, at 5:19, Sayali Patil wrote:
>
>> The hugepage-mremap selftest uses a default mapping size of 10MB
>> when no argument is provided. This size is not guaranteed to be
>> aligned to the system hugepage size, which can cause munmap() to fail
>> and mremap() to succeed where a failure is expected.
>>
>> Align the mapping length to the runtime hugepage size using
>> default_huge_page_size() to ensure the mapping is properly
>> aligned. Also handle the case where
>> default_huge_page_size() returns 0 by skipping the test.
>>
>> Before patch:
>> running ./hugepage-mremap
>> ------------------------------
>> TAP version 13
>> 1..1
>> Map haddr: Returned address is 0x7eaa40000000
>> Map daddr: Returned address is 0x7daa40000000
>> Map vaddr: Returned address is 0x7faa40000000
>> Address returned by mmap() = 0x7fffaa600000
>> Mremap: Returned address is 0x7faa40000000
>> First hex is 0
>> First hex is 3020100
>> Bail out! mremap: Expected failure, but call succeeded
>> Planned tests != run tests (1 != 0)
>> Totals: pass:0 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>> [FAIL]
>> not ok 1 hugepage-mremap # exit=1
>>
>> After patch:
>> running ./hugepage-mremap
>> -------------------------
>> TAP version 13
>> 1..1
>> Map haddr: Returned address is 0x7eaa40000000
>> Map daddr: Returned address is 0x7daa40000000
>> Map vaddr: Returned address is 0x7faa40000000
>> Address returned by mmap() = 0x7fff13000000
>> Mremap: Returned address is 0x7faa40000000
>> First hex is 0
>> First hex is 3020100
>> ok 1 Read same data
>> Totals: pass:1 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>> [PASS]
>> ok 1 hugepage-mremap
>>
>> Fixes: f77a286de48c ("mm, hugepages: make memory size variable in hugepage-mremap selftest")
>> Signed-off-by: Sayali Patil <sayalip@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-mremap.c | 10 ++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-mremap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-mremap.c
>> index b8f7d92e5a35..f66e4d806477 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-mremap.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-mremap.c
>> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>>
>> #define PROTECTION (PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC)
>> #define FLAGS (MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS)
>> +#define ALIGN(x, a) (((x) + ((a) - 1)) & ~((a) - 1))
>>
>> static void check_bytes(char *addr)
>> {
>> @@ -110,6 +111,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>> {
>> size_t length = 0;
>> int ret = 0, fd;
>> + size_t hpage_size;
>>
>> ksft_print_header();
>> ksft_set_plan(1);
>> @@ -126,6 +128,14 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>> length = DEFAULT_LENGTH_MB;
>>
>> length = MB_TO_BYTES(length);
>> +
>> + hpage_size = default_huge_page_size();
>> + if (!hpage_size)
>> + ksft_exit_skip("Unable to determine huge page size\n");
>> +
>> + /* Ensure length is hugepage aligned */
>> + length = ALIGN(length, hpage_size);
>> +
>> fd = memfd_create(argv[0], MFD_HUGETLB);
>> if (fd < 0)
>> ksft_exit_fail_msg("Open failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
>> --
>> 2.52.0
>
> LGTM. BTW, it seems that multiple files, pkey-helpers.h, migration.c,
> uffed-unit-test.c, hmm-tests.c, have their own ALIGN or ALIGN_UP.
> They can be moved to vm_utils.h, later if someone wants to do a cleanup.
>
> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
>
> Best Regards,
> Yan, Zi
>
Yes, I noticed that as well. I am planning to clean that up separately
later.
Thanks,
Sayali
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-08 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-06 9:19 [PATCH v4 00/15] selftests/mm: fix failures and robustness improvements Sayali Patil
2026-04-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] selftests/mm: restore default nr_hugepages value via EXIT trap in charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh Sayali Patil
2026-04-07 14:38 ` Zi Yan
2026-04-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] selftests/mm: fix hugetlb pathname construction " Sayali Patil
2026-04-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] selftests/mm: restore default nr_hugepages value via EXIT trap in hugetlb_reparenting_test.sh Sayali Patil
2026-04-07 14:39 ` Zi Yan
2026-04-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] selftests/mm: fix hugetlb pathname construction " Sayali Patil
2026-04-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] selftests/mm: fix cgroup task placement and drop memory.current checks " Sayali Patil
2026-04-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] selftests/mm: size tmpfs according to PMD page size in split_huge_page_test Sayali Patil
2026-04-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] selftests/mm: free dynamically allocated PMD-sized buffers " Sayali Patil
2026-04-07 14:44 ` Zi Yan
2026-04-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] selftest/mm: align memory size to huge page size in hugepage-mremap test Sayali Patil
2026-04-07 14:57 ` Zi Yan
2026-04-08 14:30 ` Sayali Patil [this message]
2026-04-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] selftest/mm: register existing mapping with userfaultfd in hugepage-mremap Sayali Patil
2026-04-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] selftests/mm: ensure destination is hugetlb-backed " Sayali Patil
2026-04-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] selftests/mm: skip uffd-wp-mremap if UFFD write-protect is unsupported Sayali Patil
2026-04-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] selftests/mm: skip uffd-stress test when nr_pages_per_cpu is zero Sayali Patil
2026-04-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] selftests/mm: move hwpoison setup into run_test() and silence modprobe output for memory-failure category Sayali Patil
2026-04-07 14:51 ` Zi Yan
2026-04-08 8:36 ` Sayali Patil
2026-04-08 15:40 ` Zi Yan
2026-04-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] selftests/mm: clarify alternate unmapping in compaction_test Sayali Patil
2026-04-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] selftests/cgroup: extend test_hugetlb_memcg.c to support all huge page sizes Sayali Patil
2026-04-07 12:07 ` Sayali Patil
2026-04-07 13:08 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] selftests/mm: fix failures and robustness improvements Venkat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=162ca3d6-c5b6-4c36-8e20-313fcc4e3eb4@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sayalip@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox