From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE6DC433E0 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 18:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466BF64EE8 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 18:53:01 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 466BF64EE8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id A974F6B006C; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 13:53:00 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id A6D0B6B006E; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 13:53:00 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 95CA66B0070; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 13:53:00 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0123.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.123]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811176B006C for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 13:53:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin21.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D67D3637 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 18:53:00 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77785111320.21.hot64_300c3cc275e7 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin21.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A54B180442C0 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 18:53:00 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: hot64_300c3cc275e7 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2694 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf39.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 18:52:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C369064DA5; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 18:52:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1612551178; bh=UeP4cWGv5rtK74a32jB0nnmkJoxUA5+l9zruHAQr0i0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Sk6gYymuBeNW7XBVuQHMHqgxAlaFkA4j0HFbg4nH56hKHWer1QF0JyMixJF3tCWcd ETEpO1yrULexe4dX+6BJb1gGPpgc9KfLNu2pYT8tT4mh9BZb6Jz5iQFeOtLk8ZgTEF /xVTc9UfsS1YyW6q+Zv8S0NbtKQk5jAgLILQhcp6ZWOpv8KKCx21hgZqWtsA8dadnI e6m8Wn/QVJPe850XR9FT90wrzD0+JKOaqRWF4U9F9lJ2C5DOb6zj1iJ7AWVVETfqB2 LjE6x+EoPXK4ycik3IyL5gIBy8y/KZXMrAR3/rJY8+E4aRj0TTOO6vpQUuC7NTNHx1 IaZDC3CeNapKQ== From: Will Deacon To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Anshuman Khandual Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com, Will Deacon , David Hildenbrand , Mark Rutland , Robin Murphy , Ard Biesheuvel , =?UTF-8?q?J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me=20Glisse?= , Mike Rapoport , James Morse , Dan Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] arm64/mm: Fix pfn_valid() for ZONE_DEVICE based memory Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 18:52:50 +0000 Message-Id: <161254816916.731861.2448215186785582734.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <1612239114-28428-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> References: <1612239114-28428-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:41:52 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > This series fixes pfn_valid() for ZONE_DEVICE based memory and also imp= roves > its performance for normal hotplug memory. While here, it also reorgani= zes > pfn_valid() on CONFIG_SPARSEMEM. This series is based on v5.11-rc6. >=20 > Question - should pfn_section_valid() be tested both for boot and non b= oot > memory as well ? >=20 > [...] Applied to arm64 (for-next/mm), thanks! [1/2] arm64/mm: Fix pfn_valid() for ZONE_DEVICE based memory https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/fccf0a3dfeaf [2/2] arm64/mm: Reorganize pfn_valid() https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/387f3531116e Cheers, --=20 Will https://fixes.arm64.dev https://next.arm64.dev https://will.arm64.dev