From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A65C55178 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 08:56:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B412068D for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 08:56:24 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A3B412068D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B419B6B00A5; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 03:56:17 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 81A5B6B00A8; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 03:56:17 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 443A76B00A6; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 03:56:17 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0251.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.251]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E845C6B00A5 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 03:56:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin01.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A01180AD80F for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 08:56:16 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77449757952.01.cork70_02139d9272c8 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6450A1004C6DE for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 08:56:16 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: cork70_02139d9272c8 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4442 Received: from out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.130]) by imf38.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 08:56:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R111e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=alimailimapcm10staff010182156082;MF=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=22;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0UEJC3Fv_1604566567; Received: from aliy80.localdomain(mailfrom:alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0UEJC3Fv_1604566567) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Thu, 05 Nov 2020 16:56:10 +0800 From: Alex Shi To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, tj@kernel.org, hughd@google.com, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, willy@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, lkp@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, richard.weiyang@gmail.com, kirill@shutemov.name, alexander.duyck@gmail.com, rong.a.chen@intel.com, mhocko@suse.com, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, shy828301@gmail.com Cc: Minchan Kim Subject: [PATCH v21 06/19] mm/rmap: stop store reordering issue on page->mapping Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 16:55:36 +0800 Message-Id: <1604566549-62481-7-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1604566549-62481-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> References: <1604566549-62481-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hugh Dickins and Minchan Kim observed a long time issue which discussed here, but actully the mentioned fix missed. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20150504031722.GA2768@blaptop/ The store reordering may cause problem in the scenario: CPU 0 CPU1 do_anonymous_page page_add_new_anon_rmap() page->mapping = anon_vma + PAGE_MAPPING_ANON lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable() spin_lock(lruvec->lock) SetPageLRU() spin_unlock(lruvec->lock) /* idletacking judged it as LRU * page so pass the page in * page_idle_clear_pte_refs */ page_idle_clear_pte_refs rmap_walk if PageAnon(page) Johannes give detailed examples how the store reordering could cause a trouble: The concern is the SetPageLRU may get reorder before 'page->mapping' setting, That would make CPU 1 will observe at page->mapping after observing PageLRU set on the page. 1. anon_vma + PAGE_MAPPING_ANON That's the in-order scenario and is fine. 2. NULL That's possible if the page->mapping store gets reordered to occur after SetPageLRU. That's fine too because we check for it. 3. anon_vma without the PAGE_MAPPING_ANON bit That would be a problem and could lead to all kinds of undesirable behavior including crashes and data corruption. Is it possible? AFAICT the compiler is allowed to tear the store to page->mapping and I don't see anything that would prevent it. That said, I also don't see how the reader testing PageLRU under the lru_lock would prevent that in the first place. AFAICT we need that WRITE_ONCE() around the page->mapping assignment. Signed-off-by: Alex Shi Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Hugh Dickins Cc: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Minchan Kim Cc: Vladimir Davydov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org --- mm/rmap.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c index 1b84945d655c..078d54da59d4 100644 --- a/mm/rmap.c +++ b/mm/rmap.c @@ -1054,8 +1054,13 @@ static void __page_set_anon_rmap(struct page *page, if (!exclusive) anon_vma = anon_vma->root; + /* + * Prevent page->mapping from pointing to an anon_vma without + * the PAGE_MAPPING_ANON bit set. This could happen if the + * compiler stores anon_vma and then adds PAGE_MAPPING_ANON to it. + */ anon_vma = (void *) anon_vma + PAGE_MAPPING_ANON; - page->mapping = (struct address_space *) anon_vma; + WRITE_ONCE(page->mapping, (struct address_space *) anon_vma); page->index = linear_page_index(vma, address); } -- 1.8.3.1