From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
bcrl@redhat.com, hch@lst.de, davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, mbligh@aracnet.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bootmem speedup from the IA64 tree
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:27:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16023.13132.215610.450669@napali.hpl.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030411135707.31175d6f.akpm@digeo.com>
>>>>> On Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:57:07 -0700, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com> said:
Andrew> Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> > Does the last_success cache ever need to be updated if someone frees
>> > some previously-allocated memory?
>> I've heard rumours that some IA64 trees can't boot without
>> this "optimisation", suggesting that they use bootmem after
>> freeing it.
Andrew> hm. Well I assume there's only one functional ia64 2.5 tree at present, and
Andrew> that's David.
Andrew> David, could you please test this?
I tried the patch with the Ski simulator (simulating a 4GB hole) and
it booted as fast as ever. Looks great to me.
The new code is in my tree now so it will be exposed to real hardware
today and over the next couple of days. I don't anticipate any
problems, but something unexpected crops up, I'll let you know.
Thanks,
--david
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-11 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-10 10:24 Christoph Hellwig
2003-04-10 10:35 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-10 14:18 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-10 16:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-10 13:59 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2003-04-10 20:43 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-10 20:34 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-10 21:07 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-10 21:02 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-04-11 20:32 ` Rik van Riel
2003-04-11 20:57 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-11 21:27 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2003-04-11 20:58 ` David Mosberger
2003-04-10 15:25 ` Anton Blanchard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16023.13132.215610.450669@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox