From: Chris Mason <clm@meta.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Christian Theune <ct@flyingcircus.io>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Dao <dqminh@cloudflare.com>,
regressions@lists.linux.dev, regressions@leemhuis.info
Subject: Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 21:17:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15f15df9-ec90-486a-a784-effb8b2cb292@meta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a3b09db-23e8-4a06-85f8-a0d7bbc3228b@meta.com>
On 9/20/24 3:54 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
[ ... ]
> xas_split_alloc() does the allocation and also shoves an entry into some of
> the slots. When the tree changes, the entry we've stored is wildly
> wrong, but xas_reset() doesn't undo any of that. So when we actually
> use the xas->xa_alloc nodes we've setup, they are pointing to the
> wrong things.
>
> Which is probably why the commits in 6.10 added this:
>
> /* entry may have changed before we re-acquire the lock */
> if (alloced_order && (old != alloced_shadow || order != alloced_order)) {
> xas_destroy(&xas);
> alloced_order = 0;
> }
>
> The only way to undo the work done by xas_split_alloc() is to call
> xas_destroy().
>
> To prove this theory, I tried making a minimal version that also
> called destroy, but it all ended up less minimal than the code
> that's actually in 6.10. I've got a long test going now with
> an extra cond_resched() to make the race bigger, and a printk of victory.
>
> It hasn't fired yet, and I need to hop on an airplane, so I'll just leave
> it running for now. But long story short, I think we should probably
> just tag all of these for stable:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240415171857.19244-2-ryncsn@gmail.com/T/#mdb85922624c39ea7efb775a044af4731890ff776
>
> Also, Willy's proposed changes to xas_split_alloc() seem like a good
> idea.
A few days of load later and some extra printks, it turns out that
taking the writer lock in __filemap_add_folio() makes us dramatically
more likely to just return EEXIST than go into the xas_split_alloc() dance.
With the changes in 6.10, we only get into that xas_destroy() case above
when the conflicting entry is a shadow entry, so I changed my repro to
use memory pressure instead of fadvise.
I also added a schedule_timeout(1) after the split alloc, and with all
of that I'm able to consistently make the xas_destroy() case trigger
without causing any system instability. Kairui Song's patches do seem
to have fixed things nicely.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-24 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-12 21:18 Christian Theune
2024-09-12 21:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-12 22:11 ` Christian Theune
2024-09-12 22:12 ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-12 22:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-12 22:30 ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-12 22:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-13 3:44 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-13 13:23 ` Christian Theune
2024-09-13 12:11 ` Christian Brauner
2024-09-16 13:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-18 9:51 ` Christian Brauner
2024-09-13 15:30 ` Chris Mason
2024-09-13 15:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-13 16:33 ` Chris Mason
2024-09-13 18:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-13 21:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-13 21:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-13 16:04 ` David Howells
2024-09-13 16:37 ` Chris Mason
2024-09-16 0:00 ` Dave Chinner
2024-09-16 4:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-16 8:47 ` Chris Mason
2024-09-17 9:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-17 9:36 ` Chris Mason
2024-09-17 10:11 ` Christian Theune
2024-09-17 11:13 ` Chris Mason
2024-09-17 13:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-18 6:37 ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-18 9:28 ` Chris Mason
2024-09-18 12:23 ` Chris Mason
2024-09-18 13:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-18 13:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-18 14:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-18 14:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-18 17:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-18 16:37 ` Chris Mason
2024-09-19 1:43 ` Dave Chinner
2024-09-19 3:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-19 3:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-19 3:38 ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-19 4:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-19 4:42 ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-19 4:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-19 4:46 ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-19 5:20 ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-19 4:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-20 13:54 ` Chris Mason
2024-09-24 15:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-24 17:16 ` Sam James
2024-09-25 16:06 ` Kairui Song
2024-09-25 16:42 ` Christian Theune
2024-09-27 14:51 ` Sam James
2024-09-27 14:58 ` Jens Axboe
2024-10-01 21:10 ` Kairui Song
2024-09-24 19:17 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2024-09-24 19:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-19 6:34 ` Christian Theune
2024-09-19 6:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-19 10:19 ` Christian Theune
2024-09-30 17:34 ` Christian Theune
2024-09-30 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-30 19:25 ` Christian Theune
2024-09-30 20:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-30 20:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-30 22:42 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2024-09-30 23:00 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2024-09-30 23:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-10-01 0:56 ` Chris Mason
2024-10-01 7:54 ` Christian Theune
2024-10-10 6:29 ` Christian Theune
2024-10-11 7:27 ` Christian Theune
2024-10-11 9:08 ` Christian Theune
2024-10-11 13:06 ` Chris Mason
2024-10-11 13:50 ` Christian Theune
2024-10-12 17:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-12-02 10:44 ` Christian Theune
2024-10-01 2:22 ` Dave Chinner
2024-09-16 7:14 ` Christian Theune
2024-09-16 12:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-18 8:31 ` Christian Theune
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15f15df9-ec90-486a-a784-effb8b2cb292@meta.com \
--to=clm@meta.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ct@flyingcircus.io \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dqminh@cloudflare.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox