From: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
david <david@fromorbit.com>, Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/8] dax: Introduce holder for dax_device
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 18:03:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15a635d6-2069-2af5-15f8-1c0513487a2f@fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YkPtptNljNcJc1g/@infradead.org>
在 2022/3/30 13:41, Christoph Hellwig 写道:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 09:46:07PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
>>> Forgive me if this has been discussed before, but since dax_operations
>>> are in terms of pgoff and nr pages and memory_failure() is in terms of
>>> pfns what was the rationale for making the function signature byte
>>> based?
>>
>> Maybe I didn't describe it clearly... The @offset and @len here are
>> byte-based. And so is ->memory_failure().
>
> Yes, but is there a good reason for that when the rest of the DAX code
> tends to work in page chunks?
Because I am not sure if the offset between each layer is page aligned.
For example, when pmem dirver handles ->memory_failure(), it should
subtract its ->data_offset when it calls dax_holder_notify_failure().
The implementation of ->memory_failure() by pmem driver:
+static int pmem_pagemap_memory_failure(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap,
+ phys_addr_t addr, u64 len, int mf_flags)
+{
+ struct pmem_device *pmem =
+ container_of(pgmap, struct pmem_device, pgmap);
+ u64 offset = addr - pmem->phys_addr - pmem->data_offset;
+
+ return dax_holder_notify_failure(pmem->dax_dev, offset, len, mf_flags);
+}
So, I choose u64 as the type of @len. And for consistency, the @addr is
using byte-based type as well.
> memory_failure()
> |* fsdax case
> |------------
> |pgmap->ops->memory_failure() => pmem_pgmap_memory_failure()
> | dax_holder_notify_failure() =>
the offset from 'pmem driver' to 'dax holder'
> | dax_device->holder_ops->notify_failure() =>
> | - xfs_dax_notify_failure()
> | |* xfs_dax_notify_failure()
> | |--------------------------
> | | xfs_rmap_query_range()
> | | xfs_dax_failure_fn()
> | | * corrupted on metadata
> | | try to recover data, call xfs_force_shutdown()
> | | * corrupted on file data
> | | try to recover data, call mf_dax_kill_procs()
> |* normal case
> |-------------
> |mf_generic_kill_procs()
--
Thanks,
Ruan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-30 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-27 12:07 [PATCH v11 0/8] fsdax: introduce fs query to support reflink Shiyang Ruan
2022-02-27 12:07 ` [PATCH v11 1/8] dax: Introduce holder for dax_device Shiyang Ruan
2022-03-11 23:35 ` Dan Williams
2022-03-16 13:46 ` Shiyang Ruan
2022-03-30 5:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-30 10:03 ` Shiyang Ruan [this message]
2022-03-30 10:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-30 10:58 ` Shiyang Ruan
2022-03-30 15:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-30 16:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-06 0:55 ` Jane Chu
2022-04-06 1:22 ` Dan Williams
2022-04-06 20:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-08 1:38 ` Dan Williams
2022-04-08 5:59 ` Shiyang Ruan
2022-03-30 5:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-27 12:07 ` [PATCH v11 2/8] mm: factor helpers for memory_failure_dev_pagemap Shiyang Ruan
2022-02-27 12:07 ` [PATCH v11 3/8] pagemap,pmem: Introduce ->memory_failure() Shiyang Ruan
2022-02-27 12:07 ` [PATCH v11 4/8] fsdax: Introduce dax_lock_mapping_entry() Shiyang Ruan
2022-02-27 12:07 ` [PATCH v11 5/8] mm: move pgoff_address() to vma_pgoff_address() Shiyang Ruan
2022-03-30 5:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-30 6:49 ` Shiyang Ruan
2022-02-27 12:07 ` [PATCH v11 6/8] mm: Introduce mf_dax_kill_procs() for fsdax case Shiyang Ruan
2022-03-30 5:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-27 12:07 ` [PATCH v11 7/8] xfs: Implement ->notify_failure() for XFS Shiyang Ruan
2022-02-27 14:05 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-27 15:36 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-27 15:46 ` kernel test robot
2022-03-30 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-30 15:16 ` Shiyang Ruan
2022-03-30 15:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-08 6:04 ` Shiyang Ruan
2022-04-08 6:26 ` Dan Williams
2022-04-08 6:25 ` Dan Williams
2022-02-27 12:07 ` [PATCH v11 8/8] fsdax: set a CoW flag when associate reflink mappings Shiyang Ruan
2022-02-27 15:57 ` kernel test robot
2022-03-10 13:08 ` [PATCH v11 0/8] fsdax: introduce fs query to support reflink Shiyang Ruan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15a635d6-2069-2af5-15f8-1c0513487a2f@fujitsu.com \
--to=ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox