From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:11:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15a40476-2852-cf5a-0982-d899dd79d9c1@c-s.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f0203bd-77ea-d94c-11b7-1befba439cd4@virtuozzo.com>
Le 27/02/2019 à 10:19, Andrey Ryabinin a écrit :
>
>
> On 2/27/19 11:25 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> With version v8 of the series implementing KASAN on 32 bits powerpc (https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=94309), I'm now able to activate KASAN on a mac99 is QEMU.
>>
>> Then I get the following reports at startup. Which of the two reports I get seems to depend on the option used to build the kernel, but for a given kernel I always get the same report.
>>
>> Is that a real bug, in which case how could I spot it ? Or is it something wrong in my implementation of KASAN ?
>>
>> I checked that after kasan_init(), the entire shadow memory is full of 0 only.
>>
>> I also made a try with the strong STACK_PROTECTOR compiled in, but no difference and nothing detected by the stack protector.
>>
>> ==================================================================
>> BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in memchr+0x24/0x74
>> Read of size 1 at addr c0ecdd40 by task swapper/0
>>
>> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.0.0-rc7+ #1133
>> Call Trace:
>> [c0e9dca0] [c01c42a0] print_address_description+0x64/0x2bc (unreliable)
>> [c0e9dcd0] [c01c4684] kasan_report+0xfc/0x180
>> [c0e9dd10] [c089579c] memchr+0x24/0x74
>> [c0e9dd30] [c00a9e38] msg_print_text+0x124/0x574
>> [c0e9dde0] [c00ab710] console_unlock+0x114/0x4f8
>> [c0e9de40] [c00adc60] vprintk_emit+0x188/0x1c4
>> --- interrupt: c0e9df00 at 0x400f330
>> LR = init_stack+0x1f00/0x2000
>> [c0e9de80] [c00ae3c4] printk+0xa8/0xcc (unreliable)
>> [c0e9df20] [c0c28e44] early_irq_init+0x38/0x108
>> [c0e9df50] [c0c16434] start_kernel+0x310/0x488
>> [c0e9dff0] [00003484] 0x3484
>>
>> The buggy address belongs to the variable:
>> __log_buf+0xec0/0x4020
>> The buggy address belongs to the page:
>> page:c6eac9a0 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000 index:0x0
>> flags: 0x1000(reserved)
>> raw: 00001000 c6eac9a4 c6eac9a4 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffffff 00000001
>> page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
>>
>> Memory state around the buggy address:
>> c0ecdc00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>> c0ecdc80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>>> c0ecdd00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 00
>> ^
>> c0ecdd80: f3 f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>> c0ecde00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>> ==================================================================
>>
>
> This one doesn't look good. Notice that it says stack-out-of-bounds, but at the same time there is
> "The buggy address belongs to the variable: __log_buf+0xec0/0x4020"
> which is printed by following code:
> if (kernel_or_module_addr(addr) && !init_task_stack_addr(addr)) {
> pr_err("The buggy address belongs to the variable:\n");
> pr_err(" %pS\n", addr);
> }
>
> So the stack unrelated address got stack-related poisoning. This could be a stack overflow, did you increase THREAD_SHIFT?
> KASAN with stack instrumentation significantly increases stack usage.
>
I get the above with THREAD_SHIFT set to 13 (default value).
If increasing it to 14, I get the following instead. That means that in
that case the problem arises a lot earlier in the boot process (but
still after the final kasan shadow setup).
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in pmac_nvram_init+0x1f8/0x5d0
Read of size 1 at addr f6f37de0 by task swapper/0
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.0.0-rc7+ #1143
Call Trace:
[c0e9fd60] [c01c43c0] print_address_description+0x164/0x2bc (unreliable)
[c0e9fd90] [c01c46a4] kasan_report+0xfc/0x180
[c0e9fdd0] [c0c226d4] pmac_nvram_init+0x1f8/0x5d0
[c0e9fef0] [c0c1f73c] pmac_setup_arch+0x298/0x314
[c0e9ff20] [c0c1ac40] setup_arch+0x250/0x268
[c0e9ff50] [c0c151dc] start_kernel+0xb8/0x488
[c0e9fff0] [00003484] 0x3484
Memory state around the buggy address:
f6f37c80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
f6f37d00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>f6f37d80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1
^
f6f37e00: 00 00 01 f4 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 f2 f2 f2 f2
f6f37e80: 00 00 00 00 f3 f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
==================================================================
Christophe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-27 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-27 8:25 Christophe Leroy
2019-02-27 8:34 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-02-27 12:35 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-02-27 13:07 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-02-27 9:19 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2019-02-27 9:25 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-02-27 9:33 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-02-27 13:11 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2019-02-28 9:22 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2019-02-28 9:27 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-02-28 9:47 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2019-02-28 9:54 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-02-28 13:41 ` Christophe Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15a40476-2852-cf5a-0982-d899dd79d9c1@c-s.fr \
--to=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=dja@axtens.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox