From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8965AC43461 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 11:34:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB98206B7 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 11:34:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4BB98206B7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=bitdefender.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id DBDA7900006; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 07:34:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D6C17900003; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 07:34:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id C8164900006; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 07:34:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0089.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.89]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0632900003 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 07:34:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin16.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661A5180AD801 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 11:34:05 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77225170050.16.roof01_440e9b3270b1 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39BF9100E6903 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 11:34:05 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: roof01_440e9b3270b1 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2552 Received: from mx01.bbu.dsd.mx.bitdefender.com (mx01.bbu.dsd.mx.bitdefender.com [91.199.104.161]) by imf36.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 11:34:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.bitdefender.com (smtp01.buh.bitdefender.com [10.17.80.75]) by mx01.bbu.dsd.mx.bitdefender.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ABDF30003EE; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 14:34:03 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (unknown [195.189.155.252]) by smtp.bitdefender.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 033E23072785; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 14:34:02 +0300 (EEST) From: Adalbert =?iso-8859-2?b?TGF643I=?= Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Remote mapping To: Christian Brauner Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Alexander Graf , Stefan Hajnoczi , Jerome Glisse , Paolo Bonzini , Andy Lutomirski , Arnd Bergmann , Sargun Dhillon , Aleksa Sarai , Oleg Nesterov , Jann Horn , Kees Cook , Matthew Wilcox , linux-api@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20200904095438.q3vuihvfivhdjvxs@wittgenstein> References: <20200903174730.2685-1-alazar@bitdefender.com> <20200904095438.q3vuihvfivhdjvxs@wittgenstein> Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 14:34:28 +0300 Message-ID: <15992192680.0c72E.21107@host> User-agent: void Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 39BF9100E6903 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 11:54:38 +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 08:47:25PM +0300, Adalbert Laz=C4=83r wrote: > > This patchset adds support for the remote mapping feature. > > Remote mapping, as its name suggests, is a means for transparent and > > zero-copy access of a remote process' address space. > > access of a remote process' address space. >=20 > Hey Adalbert, >=20 > Thanks for the patch. When you resend this patch series, could you > please make sure that everyone Cced on any individual patch receives th= e > full patch series? I only got patch 5/5 and it's a bit annoying because > one completely lacks context of what's going on. I first thought "did > someone just add a syscall with 3 lines of commit message?". :) >=20 > Could you please resend the patch series with linux-api, me and the > following people Cced: Done :D Thank you, Christian