From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8C0C433E3 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903EB2076B for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="eDg4DOyG" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 903EB2076B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id CA5356B00C4; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 04:11:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id C2DC36B00C5; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 04:11:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id AF56D6B00C6; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 04:11:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0038.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.38]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B586B00C4 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 04:11:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin25.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7DC8248047 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:11:34 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77141197308.25.rule73_341768b26fe9 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C9B1804E3A1 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:11:33 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: rule73_341768b26fe9 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4891 Received: from mail-pf1-f196.google.com (mail-pf1-f196.google.com [209.85.210.196]) by imf04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf1-f196.google.com with SMTP id a79so620725pfa.8 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 01:11:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Gqk0IHazkAbnd1TceTY1ZmQMSGqDC0SOsCEO7z8wdv4=; b=eDg4DOyGlwZXAxfvrAWm2bCGM35Xhc/MB9AlQ5a1VVdBg214Fqq5NUhxfeckALVZVq wshSpJhFV1UCo2gBcr2GGbD55UBFts6DFhFkvmTXBF0lBdloY7tgosoqUiST7/3+f4Wy m3UjaCLNjlrWpvYZYHC5+klYfXP17VtghaLl7pRWaAMR1WBENVLQYlEANV+cZudg+7PM KSCK/45JABfmQvheqKAbLQdbOnlT99QuAvOj6/AID7IafCM387DZA3oBUkeCAl910hCa Kmo6hG6oIwJngdWFZ2hs+X4wZZ/80PKxgjTW96HR0Zh6X+gJwR38Uq7MueTEyFISYi1X O91g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Gqk0IHazkAbnd1TceTY1ZmQMSGqDC0SOsCEO7z8wdv4=; b=du6Bxn1kR5C5wl582G+ZrjpiJgZQEASRp8n+OSrSHNpVU3oivKwPxXQW4zJW26W9H7 1G1VgkSuzzDCfvraa98RBFlZdlOnNbAcj2oq1kpUQ1i9eAuHFBjdXQTtbKPLGACIP2vq c6RLpRPQVa3V+nH78+LNmDU5Tm+POltQ6F46svn4GaoINCamiBKvJ29g6xUJtcqSEViA u0A6acIhLfB1iE/jmmmnFACEShuB5wQ9+8zqqrWZ0yvBbcySa5NlLPc9IsPZOVfsk/nE y5jBkGuCzK536vkWisyHUZdfXBCSiqdbgT+OhTT3DSDWUgmx29I5VlxAQuQbK68xlqF5 Fq8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531wj6eyLvAU5ZOf39rWohWVDGlU/Q6arxtB/HRwt8TCJxctOVRK 34K3QMS3erIYzrNTCM9/p38= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyqkUbovHh5ka3/XaSTC8ODlUDFJft07FCaI95cZAdpIni7GZOC8/CuFKmKXdXYaPrreAj/Bw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:787:: with SMTP id g7mr9620510pfu.290.1597219892350; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 01:11:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (193-116-193-175.tpgi.com.au. [193.116.193.175]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w82sm1547171pff.7.2020.08.12.01.11.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 12 Aug 2020 01:11:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 18:11:25 +1000 From: Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] huge vmalloc mappings To: Jonathan Cameron , Zefan Li Cc: Borislav Petkov , =?iso-8859-1?q?Catalin=0A?= Marinas , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Will Deacon , x86@kernel.org References: <20200810022732.1150009-1-npiggin@gmail.com> <20200811173217.0000161e@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <1597219299.b5noer1k93.astroid@bobo.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B2C9B1804E3A1 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Excerpts from Zefan Li's message of August 12, 2020 11:07 am: > On 2020/8/12 0:32, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 12:27:24 +1000 >> Nicholas Piggin wrote: >>=20 >>> Not tested on x86 or arm64, would appreciate a quick test there so I ca= n >>> ask Andrew to put it in -mm. Other option is I can disable huge vmalloc= s >>> for them for the time being. >>=20 >> Hi Nicholas, >>=20 >> For arm64 testing with a Kunpeng920. >>=20 >> I ran a quick sanity test with this series on top of mainline (yes mid m= erge window >> so who knows what state is...). Could I be missing some dependency? >>=20 >> Without them it boots, with them it doesn't. Any immediate guesses? >>=20 >=20 > I've already reported this bug in v2, and yeah I also tested it on arm64 > (not Kunpeng though), so looks like it still hasn't been fixed. Huh, I thought I did fix it but seems not. vmap stacks shouldn't be=20 big enough to use huge pages though, so I don't know what's going on there. I'll dig around a bit more. >=20 > ... >>> >>> Since v2: >>> - Rebased on vmalloc cleanups, split series into simpler pieces. >>> - Fixed several compile errors and warnings >>> - Keep the page array and accounting in small page units because >>> struct vm_struct is an interface (this should fix x86 vmap stack debu= g >>> assert). [Thanks Zefan] >=20 > though the changelog says it's fixed for x86. Yes, my mistake that was supposed to say arm64. Thanks, Nick