From: David Anders <dave123_aml@yahoo.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>,
"Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br>
Subject: Re: Remove warning in compilation of ioremap
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 07:59:27 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <157617.9043.qm@web54404.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080909135532.GE8894@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Russell,
> > i hope you have a better time getting this fixed than
> i have,
> > i've been submitting patches as far back as
> 2.6.16:
> >
> >
> http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20070906.135142.6c5e4d6f.en.html
> >
> http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20070906.140649.79f143a0.en.html
> >
> > 2.6.23 was when i gave up.
>
> It's not like you were ignored, both of those messages
> contain replies
> from Erik Mouw, both of which were positive.
>
> Unfortunately, I didn't see it as a high priority so it
> got left a little
> too long and I never got around to commenting about it (I
> thought it was
> a complex way of fixing what was a trivial problem.)
>
water under the bridge, just happy it got fixed.
> Take a look at the difference between yours:
>
>
> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=4563/1
>
> Comapred with the one which has been merged:
>
>
> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=5211/2
>
> Sorry.
agreed there are differences between what got accepted and what i submited. however, i did not randomly choose the code used in that define. i went back to the mailing lists for x86,powerpc, parisc, mips and sh. the code format of BUG() had been discussed on each of these lists, with x86, powerpc, and parisc using the exact same code format as i submitted, with mips and sh using one almost identical.
from include/asm-x86/bug.h
#define BUG() \
do { \
asm volatile("ud2"); \
for(;;) ; \
} while(0)
what i submited:
+#define BUG() \
+ do { \
+ (*(int *)0 = 0); \
+ for(;;) ; \
+ } while(0)
i apologize if this is a rant, no disrespect for your work or the pressure you are under to maintain LAK, but shall we always wait until there is a 100% elegant solution to a known issue before fixing it?
Dave Anders
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-09 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-09 9:13 Claudio Scordino
2008-09-09 9:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-09-09 13:49 ` Claudio Scordino
2008-09-09 13:08 ` David Anders
2008-09-09 13:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-09-09 14:59 ` David Anders [this message]
2008-09-09 15:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=157617.9043.qm@web54404.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=dave123_aml@yahoo.com \
--cc=claudio@evidence.eu.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=philb@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox