From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
tj@kernel.org, hughd@google.com, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru,
daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/8] mm/lru: remove rcu_read_lock to fix performance regression
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 22:06:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1573567588-47048-7-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1573567588-47048-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Intel 0day report there are performance regression on this patchset.
The detailed info points to rcu_read_lock + PROVE_LOCKING which causes
queued_spin_lock_slowpath waiting too long time to get lock.
Remove rcu_read_lock is safe here since we had a spinlock hold.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 29 ++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 2421b720d272..f869897a68f0 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -1307,20 +1307,18 @@ static inline struct lruvec *relock_page_lruvec_irq(struct page *page,
struct pglist_data *pgdat = page_pgdat(page);
struct lruvec *lruvec;
- rcu_read_lock();
+ if (!locked_lruvec)
+ goto lock;
+
lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, pgdat);
- if (locked_lruvec == lruvec) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (locked_lruvec == lruvec)
return lruvec;
- }
- rcu_read_unlock();
- if (locked_lruvec)
- spin_unlock_irq(&locked_lruvec->lru_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&locked_lruvec->lru_lock);
+lock:
lruvec = lock_page_lruvec_irq(page, pgdat);
-
return lruvec;
}
@@ -1331,21 +1329,18 @@ static inline struct lruvec *relock_page_lruvec_irqsave(struct page *page,
struct pglist_data *pgdat = page_pgdat(page);
struct lruvec *lruvec;
- rcu_read_lock();
+ if (!locked_lruvec)
+ goto lock;
+
lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, pgdat);
- if (locked_lruvec == lruvec) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (locked_lruvec == lruvec)
return lruvec;
- }
- rcu_read_unlock();
- if (locked_lruvec)
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&locked_lruvec->lru_lock,
- locked_lruvec->flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&locked_lruvec->lru_lock, locked_lruvec->flags);
+lock:
lruvec = lock_page_lruvec_irqsave(page, pgdat);
-
return lruvec;
}
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-12 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-12 14:06 [PATCH v2 0/8] per lruvec lru_lock for memcg Alex Shi
2019-11-12 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] mm/lru: add per lruvec lock " Alex Shi
2019-11-12 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] mm/lruvec: add irqsave flags into lruvec struct Alex Shi
2019-11-12 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] mm/lru: replace pgdat lru_lock with lruvec lock Alex Shi
2019-11-12 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] mm/lru: only change the lru_lock iff page's lruvec is different Alex Shi
2019-11-12 14:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-11-13 2:26 ` Alex Shi
2019-11-13 13:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-11-14 6:01 ` Alex Shi
2019-11-12 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] mm/pgdat: remove pgdat lru_lock Alex Shi
2019-11-12 14:06 ` Alex Shi [this message]
2019-11-12 14:38 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] mm/lru: remove rcu_read_lock to fix performance regression Matthew Wilcox
2019-11-13 2:40 ` Alex Shi
2019-11-13 11:40 ` Mel Gorman
2019-11-14 6:02 ` Alex Shi
2019-11-12 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] mm/lru: likely enhancement Alex Shi
2019-11-12 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] mm/lru: revise the comments of lru_lock Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1573567588-47048-7-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
--cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox