From: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
To: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
<will.deacon@arm.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>, <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
<tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>,
<ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<kexec@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>, <horms@verge.net.au>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Bhupesh SHARMA <bhupesh.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] support reserving crashkernel above 4G on arm64 kdump
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 10:24:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1567962e-f60b-60c2-1f73-10e07377be1e@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf4050c5-cfb7-fd69-4892-1e0b65861d34@huawei.com>
Hi Catalin,
Sorry to ping you.
What's your suggestion about this patch series? I am looking forward to your replay.
Thanks,
Chen Zhou
On 2019/5/16 11:19, Chen Zhou wrote:
> Hi Bhupesh,
>
> On 2019/5/15 13:06, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>> +Cc kexec-list.
>>
>> Hi Chen,
>>
>> I think we are still in the quiet period of the merge cycle, but this is a change which will be useful for systems like HPE Apollo where we are looking at reserving crashkernel across a larger range.
>>
>> Some comments inline and in respective patch threads..
>>
>> On 05/07/2019 09:20 AM, Chen Zhou wrote:
>>> This patch series enable reserving crashkernel on high memory in arm64.
>>
>> Please fix the patch subject, it should be v5.
>> Also please Cc the kexec-list (kexec@lists.infradead.org) for future versions to allow wider review of the patchset.
>>
>>> We use crashkernel=X to reserve crashkernel below 4G, which will fail
>>> when there is no enough memory. Currently, crashkernel=Y@X can be used
>>> to reserve crashkernel above 4G, in this case, if swiotlb or DMA buffers
>>> are requierd, capture kernel will boot failure because of no low memory.
>>
>> ... ^^ required
>>
>> s/capture kernel will boot failure because of no low memory./capture kernel boot will fail because there is no low memory available for allocation.
>>
>>> When crashkernel is reserved above 4G in memory, kernel should reserve
>>> some amount of low memory for swiotlb and some DMA buffers. So there may
>>> be two crash kernel regions, one is below 4G, the other is above 4G. Then
>>> Crash dump kernel reads more than one crash kernel regions via a dtb
>>> property under node /chosen,
>>> linux,usable-memory-range = <BASE1 SIZE1 [BASE2 SIZE2]>.
>>
>> Please use consistent naming for the second kernel, better to use crash dump kernel.
>>
>> I have tested this on my HPE Apollo machine and with crashkernel=886M,high syntax, I can get the board to reserve a larger memory range for the crashkernel (i.e. 886M):
>>
>> # dmesg | grep -i crash
>> [ 0.000000] kexec_core: Reserving 256MB of low memory at 3560MB for crashkernel (System low RAM: 2029MB)
>> [ 0.000000] crashkernel reserved: 0x0000000bc5a00000 - 0x0000000bfd000000 (886 MB)
>>
>> kexec/kdump can also work also work fine on the board.
>>
>> So, with the changes suggested in this cover letter and individual patches, please feel free to add:
>>
>> Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bhupesh
>>
>
> Thanks for you review and test. I will fix these later.
>
> Thanks,
> Chen Zhou
>
>>> Besides, we need to modify kexec-tools:
>>> arm64: support more than one crash kernel regions(see [1])
>>>
>>> I post this patch series about one month ago. The previous changes and
>>> discussions can be retrived from:
>>>
>>> Changes since [v4]
>>> - reimplement memblock_cap_memory_ranges for multiple ranges by Mike.
>>>
>>> Changes since [v3]
>>> - Add memblock_cap_memory_ranges back for multiple ranges.
>>> - Fix some compiling warnings.
>>>
>>> Changes since [v2]
>>> - Split patch "arm64: kdump: support reserving crashkernel above 4G" as
>>> two. Put "move reserve_crashkernel_low() into kexec_core.c" in a separate
>>> patch.
>>>
>>> Changes since [v1]:
>>> - Move common reserve_crashkernel_low() code into kernel/kexec_core.c.
>>> - Remove memblock_cap_memory_ranges() i added in v1 and implement that
>>> in fdt_enforce_memory_region().
>>> There are at most two crash kernel regions, for two crash kernel regions
>>> case, we cap the memory range [min(regs[*].start), max(regs[*].end)]
>>> and then remove the memory range in the middle.
>>>
>>> [1]: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2019-April/022792.html
>>> [v1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/2/1174
>>> [v2]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/9/86
>>> [v3]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/9/306
>>> [v4]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/15/273
>>>
>>> Chen Zhou (3):
>>> x86: kdump: move reserve_crashkernel_low() into kexec_core.c
>>> arm64: kdump: support reserving crashkernel above 4G
>>> kdump: update Documentation about crashkernel on arm64
>>>
>>> Mike Rapoport (1):
>>> memblock: extend memblock_cap_memory_range to multiple ranges
>>>
>>> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 6 +--
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h | 3 ++
>>> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 3 ++
>>> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++------
>>> arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h | 3 ++
>>> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 66 +++--------------------
>>> include/linux/kexec.h | 5 ++
>>> include/linux/memblock.h | 2 +-
>>> kernel/kexec_core.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> mm/memblock.c | 44 +++++++--------
>>> 10 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-03 2:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-07 3:50 Chen Zhou
2019-05-07 3:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: kdump: move reserve_crashkernel_low() into kexec_core.c Chen Zhou
2019-06-05 16:29 ` James Morse
2019-06-13 11:26 ` Chen Zhou
2019-06-12 8:45 ` Dave Young
2019-06-13 11:27 ` Chen Zhou
2019-05-07 3:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm64: kdump: support reserving crashkernel above 4G Chen Zhou
2019-06-05 16:29 ` James Morse
2019-06-13 11:27 ` Chen Zhou
2019-06-13 12:44 ` James Morse
2019-05-07 3:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] memblock: extend memblock_cap_memory_range to multiple ranges Chen Zhou
2019-05-07 3:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] kdump: update Documentation about crashkernel on arm64 Chen Zhou
2019-05-15 5:16 ` Bhupesh Sharma
2019-05-16 3:23 ` Chen Zhou
2019-05-15 5:06 ` [PATCH 0/4] support reserving crashkernel above 4G on arm64 kdump Bhupesh Sharma
2019-05-16 3:19 ` Chen Zhou
2019-06-03 2:24 ` Chen Zhou [this message]
2019-06-05 16:32 ` James Morse
2019-06-13 11:27 ` Chen Zhou
2019-06-13 12:43 ` James Morse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1567962e-f60b-60c2-1f73-10e07377be1e@huawei.com \
--to=chenzhou10@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bhsharma@redhat.com \
--cc=bhupesh.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox