linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	kbuild-all@01.org,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [mmotm:master 124/234] mm/vmalloc.c:520:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'p4d_large'; did you mean 'p4d_page'?
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 12:24:27 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1559269231.3e5ttes2dd.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201905310708.EAdSCJKR%lkp@intel.com>

kbuild test robot's on May 31, 2019 9:42 am:
> tree:   git://git.cmpxchg.org/linux-mmotm.git master
> head:   6f11685c34f638e200dd9e821491584ef5717d57
> commit: 91c106f5d623b94305af3fd91113de1cba768d73 [124/234] mm/vmalloc: hugepage vmalloc mappings
> config: arm64-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.4.0
> reproduce:
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         git checkout 91c106f5d623b94305af3fd91113de1cba768d73
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         GCC_VERSION=7.4.0 make.cross ARCH=arm64 
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    mm/vmalloc.c: In function 'vmap_range':
>    mm/vmalloc.c:325:19: error: 'start' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'stat'?
>      flush_cache_vmap(start, end);
>                       ^~~~~
>                       stat
>    mm/vmalloc.c:325:19: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>    mm/vmalloc.c: In function 'vmalloc_to_page':
>>> mm/vmalloc.c:520:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'p4d_large'; did you mean 'p4d_page'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>      if (p4d_large(*p4d))
>          ^~~~~~~~~
>          p4d_page

Hmm, okay p?d_large I guess is not quite the right thing to use here. It
almost is, but it's tied to userspace/thp options.

What would people prefer to do here? We could have architectures that
define HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP to also provide p?d_huge_kernel() tests for
their kernel page tables?

Thanks,
Nick



      reply	other threads:[~2019-05-31  2:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-30 23:42 kbuild test robot
2019-05-31  2:24 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1559269231.3e5ttes2dd.astroid@bobo.none \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox