From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, keith.busch@intel.com,
vishal.l.verma@intel.com, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/5] EFI Special Purpose Memory Support
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 12:08:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <155440490809.3190322.15060922240602775809.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
The EFI 2.8 Specification [1] introduces the EFI_MEMORY_SP ("special
purpose") memory attribute. This attribute bit replaces the deprecated
"reservation hint" that was introduced in ACPI 6.2 and removed in ACPI
6.3.
Given the increasing diversity of memory types that might be advertised
to the operating system, there is a need for platform firmware to hint
which memory ranges are free for the OS to use as general purpose memory
and which ranges are intended for application specific usage. For
example, an application with prior knowledge of the platform may expect
to be able to exclusively allocate a precious / limited pool of high
bandwidth memory. Alternatively, for the general purpose case, the
operating system may want to make the memory available on a best effort
basis as a unique numa-node with performance properties by the new
CONFIG_HMEM_REPORTING [2] facility.
In support of allowing for both exclusive and core-kernel-mm managed
access to differentiated memory, claim EFI_MEMORY_SP ranges for exposure
as device-dax instances by default. Those instances can be directly
owned / mapped by a platform-topology-aware application. However, with
the new kmem facility [3], the administrator has the option to instead
designate that those memory ranges be hot-added to the core-kernel-mm as
a unique memory numa-node. In short, allow for the decision about what
software agent manages special purpose memory to be made at runtime.
The patches are based on v8 of Keith's "HMEM" series currently in Greg's
driver-core-testing branch [4], and have not been tested. This is an RFC
proposal on how to handle the new EFI memory attribute.
[1]: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/UEFI_Spec_2_8_final.pdf
[2]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git/commit/?h=driver-core-testing&id=b6efba75c449
[3]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c221c0b0308f
[4]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git/log/?h=driver-core-testing
---
Dan Williams (5):
efi: Detect UEFI 2.8 Special Purpose Memory
lib/memregion: Uplevel the pmem "region" ida to a global allocator
acpi/hmat: Track target address ranges
acpi/hmat: Register special purpose memory as a device
device-dax: Add a driver for "hmem" devices
arch/x86/Kconfig | 18 +++++
arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c | 5 +
arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c | 2 -
arch/x86/include/asm/e820/types.h | 9 ++
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 9 ++
arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 10 ++-
drivers/acpi/hmat/Kconfig | 1
drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
drivers/dax/Kconfig | 26 ++++++-
drivers/dax/Makefile | 2 +
drivers/dax/hmem.c | 58 +++++++++++++++
drivers/nvdimm/Kconfig | 1
drivers/nvdimm/core.c | 1
drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h | 1
drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c | 13 +--
include/linux/efi.h | 14 ++++
include/linux/ioport.h | 1
include/linux/memregion.h | 9 ++
lib/Kconfig | 6 ++
lib/Makefile | 1
lib/memregion.c | 22 ++++++
21 files changed, 304 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/dax/hmem.c
create mode 100644 include/linux/memregion.h
create mode 100644 lib/memregion.c
next reply other threads:[~2019-04-04 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-04 19:08 Dan Williams [this message]
2019-04-04 19:08 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] efi: Detect UEFI 2.8 Special Purpose Memory Dan Williams
2019-04-06 4:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-04-09 16:43 ` Dan Williams
2019-04-09 17:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-04-10 2:10 ` Dan Williams
2019-04-12 20:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-04-12 21:18 ` Dan Williams
2019-04-15 11:43 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2019-04-04 19:08 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] lib/memregion: Uplevel the pmem "region" ida to a global allocator Dan Williams
2019-04-04 19:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-04-04 21:02 ` Dan Williams
2019-04-04 19:08 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] acpi/hmat: Track target address ranges Dan Williams
2019-04-04 20:58 ` Keith Busch
2019-04-04 20:58 ` Dan Williams
2019-04-04 19:08 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] acpi/hmat: Register special purpose memory as a device Dan Williams
2019-04-05 11:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-04-05 15:43 ` Dan Williams
2019-04-05 16:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-04-05 16:56 ` Dan Williams
2019-04-05 17:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-04-09 12:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-09 14:49 ` Dan Williams
2019-04-04 19:08 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] device-dax: Add a driver for "hmem" devices Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=155440490809.3190322.15060922240602775809.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox