From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1319AC10F00 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 20:16:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E9A2084B for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 20:16:34 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D0E9A2084B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 6C85D6B0273; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:16:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 677396B0274; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:16:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 5B4726B0275; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:16:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291B56B0273 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:16:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id w27so6451528edb.13 for ; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 13:16:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-original-authentication-results:x-gm-message-state:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Fgwlcj426vNPr1Zk7L7k5LY+HGdH7onlyfedTfEaV48=; b=eSybVogxvyfHY+ibfO9ZZPvTJJimtJ1mttuEE29ZUpFo2jdBcV3c070OnIkA47pyGg w+UNlv2lvr5OtJiUMiDEQZFUXUOH7KvMlGrZLVvW2R9umuNW1AKwT4/YdYJaNuU1ySbv 2zt5caDZtP4VND5eupo7MA9uSImT5C0E+tAUIAnFC6jnsDGBQq5hCly70lwlmxu83dtv 8h0toN195+pimhQ+vxxVXagBsWyhnhz8AXcUFV3ZXohn5CsBtA3E2+5A/CQ0GJc2Otl/ FSgDcuIwXx8QN5PNOWGRd+6s+bWnTqvOs297bk9uRWTa4jl6biXsElMwBE1cSnjLVhfb f+Uw== X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of osalvador@suse.de designates 195.135.220.15 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=osalvador@suse.de X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUUfnWu8AR94rF2wQ6+dL1HvazUG72x68FWIQLEykCNVSgxcEAf CiyLTjeFnMCMGd/t3TL//XZnwT8WjOYHhtbC1Q8awAtudOC8l7C8XUPsZnMLh2nVMJOtxCLSQs/ ACOaE2NCSL0yAvh6CfuyC92QM36rEG/EWd4zxRbHV8X3f0x0ei3aY5DEypL00HCO0CQ== X-Received: by 2002:a50:8bb4:: with SMTP id m49mr49397280edm.28.1554236193736; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 13:16:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxDLBTcoD+/IY86E4zMPhXxIc2wrLvYIFf6WOiOwNOJefI0YaXvwyvFxrN4lWgEmFf0YPvG X-Received: by 2002:a50:8bb4:: with SMTP id m49mr49397233edm.28.1554236192916; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 13:16:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1554236192; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qUZ8zBtlY1jDzULodo87yrc21oH+c9WAfUL2CegLsbQ31+6sJP7UIERVTq8zzCZGfe hVFGO0j0vhIn6xsymo78vnd7INCLq7UA8UXUPDafgXbSgs/9FBkoQjkeg3nlXnZM/710 E75DxujZFj/0cSgoSCLn1lKdhfuAj5CUyxSAr+PkdKwWO2AlX75j3ACrSdTmce9ntmvX 4WYwBFDU7VJH81Ne3Oan6XbGh2vfDOngASiGCSa14vO4929MUfUFkPNx6kfpyt3iNxy6 iFJ6BWIik+aAkMtG1cxM/zZ5kHEvZJVPgizKtRrUVLCBHW1ocTIS2yxf4VdIXefsYbmS 7TdQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date :cc:to:from:subject:message-id; bh=Fgwlcj426vNPr1Zk7L7k5LY+HGdH7onlyfedTfEaV48=; b=fSA+YG8ha3xd4s6w3zqaLgVNcApd2kFRQxDWL/n4ZQkEZDym+UiGtOi0lgQ7gSpR25 0uhqS0IxyBs6JVvUSqJywt3edAgB1lLBn5by0lpTCMsf6ASTtb57Yst/KFCMoSE/pPcD 5b9IkYmVZayWVR5lQ8pT3bh3DJXTAVUKIM8TrYzr7HYgo8rGFm2Bh7bQ6xi+12WDnHWt eNp9ZnivN57njfapmWOE2kQBcqPT6t6zkiOq6MAXQaA4C+LhwVXxyxPWe3+ieYgWqkux EybojKegKByv1Xld94f53tDFl40SHfJyN5sbK8zzWAhzlKGUclyq2gPA5tA2rmOZSUO2 YQ5g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of osalvador@suse.de designates 195.135.220.15 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=osalvador@suse.de Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n10si3101970ejh.79.2019.04.02.13.16.32 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Apr 2019 13:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of osalvador@suse.de designates 195.135.220.15 as permitted sender) client-ip=195.135.220.15; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of osalvador@suse.de designates 195.135.220.15 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=osalvador@suse.de X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90F1AEA3; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 20:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1554236175.2828.5.camel@suse.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: Get rid of NODEMASK_ALLOC From: Oscar Salvador To: Andrew Morton Cc: mike.kravetz@oracle.com, n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 22:16:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20190402130153.338e59c6cfda1ed3ec882517@linux-foundation.org> References: <20190402133415.21983-1-osalvador@suse.de> <20190402130153.338e59c6cfda1ed3ec882517@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 13:01 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > It took a bit of sleuthing to figure out that this patch applies to > Mike's "hugetlbfs: fix potential over/underflow setting node specific > nr_hugepages". Should they be folded together? I'm thinking not. Sorry Andrew, I should have mentioned that this patch was based on Mike's "hugetlb fix potential over/underflow" patch. Given said that, I would keep the two patches separated, as that one is a fix, and this one is a cleanup. > (Also, should "hugetlbfs: fix potential over/underflow setting node > specific nr_hugepages" have been -stableified? I also think not, but > I > bet it happens anyway). I am not sure of the consequences in older branches, but if it is not too much of a hassle, it might be worth? Mike might know better here. -- Oscar Salvador SUSE L3