From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Logan Gunthorpe" <logang@deltatee.com>,
"Toshi Kani" <toshi.kani@hpe.com>,
"Jeff Moyer" <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 00/10] mm: Sub-section memory hotplug support
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:57:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <155327387405.225273.9325594075351253804.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
Changes since v4 [1]:
- Given v4 was from March of 2017 the bulk of the changes result from
rebasing the patch set from a v4.11-rc2 baseline to v5.1-rc1.
- A unit test is added to ndctl to exercise the creation and dax
mounting of multiple independent namespaces in a single 128M section.
[1]: https://lwn.net/Articles/717383/
---
Quote patch7:
"The libnvdimm sub-system has suffered a series of hacks and broken
workarounds for the memory-hotplug implementation's awkward
section-aligned (128MB) granularity. For example the following backtrace
is emitted when attempting arch_add_memory() with physical address
ranges that intersect 'System RAM' (RAM) with 'Persistent Memory' (PMEM)
within a given section:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 558 at kernel/memremap.c:300 devm_memremap_pages+0x3b5/0x4c0
devm_memremap_pages attempted on mixed region [mem 0x200000000-0x2fbffffff flags 0x200]
[..]
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x86/0xc3
__warn+0xcb/0xf0
warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5f/0x80
devm_memremap_pages+0x3b5/0x4c0
__wrap_devm_memremap_pages+0x58/0x70 [nfit_test_iomap]
pmem_attach_disk+0x19a/0x440 [nd_pmem]
Recently it was discovered that the problem goes beyond RAM vs PMEM
collisions as some platform produce PMEM vs PMEM collisions within a
given section. The libnvdimm workaround for that case revealed that the
libnvdimm section-alignment-padding implementation has been broken for a
long while. A fix for that long-standing breakage introduces as many
problems as it solves as it would require a backward-incompatible change
to the namespace metadata interpretation. Instead of that dubious route
[2], address the root problem in the memory-hotplug implementation."
The approach is taken is to observe that each section already maintains
an array of 'unsigned long' values to hold the pageblock_flags. A single
additional 'unsigned long' is added to house a 'sub-section active'
bitmask. Each bit tracks the mapped state of one sub-section's worth of
capacity which is SECTION_SIZE / BITS_PER_LONG, or 2MB on x86-64.
The implication of allowing sections to be piecemeal mapped/unmapped is
that the valid_section() helper is no longer authoritative to determine
if a section is fully mapped. Instead pfn_valid() is updated to consult
the section-active bitmask. Given that typical memory hotplug still has
deep "section" dependencies the sub-section capability is limited to
'want_memblock=false' invocations of arch_add_memory(), effectively only
devm_memremap_pages() users for now.
With this in place the hacks in the libnvdimm sub-system can be
dropped, and other devm_memremap_pages() users need no longer be
constrained to 128MB mapping granularity.
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/155000671719.348031.2347363160141119237.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
---
Dan Williams (10):
mm/sparsemem: Introduce struct mem_section_usage
mm/sparsemem: Introduce common definitions for the size and mask of a section
mm/sparsemem: Add helpers track active portions of a section at boot
mm/hotplug: Prepare shrink_{zone,pgdat}_span for sub-section removal
mm/sparsemem: Convert kmalloc_section_memmap() to populate_section_memmap()
mm/sparsemem: Prepare for sub-section ranges
mm/sparsemem: Support sub-section hotplug
mm/devm_memremap_pages: Enable sub-section remap
libnvdimm/pfn: Fix fsdax-mode namespace info-block zero-fields
libnvdimm/pfn: Stop padding pmem namespaces to section alignment
arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 15 +-
drivers/nvdimm/dax_devs.c | 2
drivers/nvdimm/pfn.h | 12 -
drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c | 93 +++-------
include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 7 -
include/linux/mm.h | 4
include/linux/mmzone.h | 60 ++++++
kernel/memremap.c | 57 ++----
mm/hmm.c | 2
mm/memory_hotplug.c | 119 +++++++-----
mm/page_alloc.c | 6 -
mm/sparse-vmemmap.c | 21 +-
mm/sparse.c | 382 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
13 files changed, 476 insertions(+), 304 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2019-03-22 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-22 16:57 Dan Williams [this message]
2019-03-22 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] mm/sparsemem: Introduce struct mem_section_usage Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] mm/sparsemem: Introduce common definitions for the size and mask of a section Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] mm/sparsemem: Add helpers track active portions of a section at boot Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] mm/hotplug: Prepare shrink_{zone, pgdat}_span for sub-section removal Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] mm/sparsemem: Convert kmalloc_section_memmap() to populate_section_memmap() Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] mm/sparsemem: Prepare for sub-section ranges Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] mm/sparsemem: Support sub-section hotplug Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] mm/devm_memremap_pages: Enable sub-section remap Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] libnvdimm/pfn: Fix fsdax-mode namespace info-block zero-fields Dan Williams
2019-03-27 14:00 ` Sasha Levin
2019-03-22 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] libnvdimm/pfn: Stop padding pmem namespaces to section alignment Dan Williams
2019-03-22 18:05 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] mm: Sub-section memory hotplug support Michal Hocko
2019-03-22 18:32 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-25 10:19 ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-25 14:28 ` Jeff Moyer
2019-03-25 14:50 ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-25 20:03 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-26 8:04 ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-27 0:20 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-27 16:13 ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-27 16:17 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-28 13:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-28 14:16 ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-01 9:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-28 20:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-28 20:43 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-28 21:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-28 21:32 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-28 21:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-10 9:51 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=155327387405.225273.9325594075351253804.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox