From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA1BC433E2 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 07:38:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E16207D3 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 07:38:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A6E16207D3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cn.fujitsu.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 2989B280013; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 03:38:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 1FAA08000E; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 03:38:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 09B76280013; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 03:38:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0178.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.178]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07D58000E for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 03:38:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin07.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D169440E for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 07:38:03 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76890725646.07.tooth99_290277ba4a248 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7A21803F9AA for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 07:38:03 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: tooth99_290277ba4a248 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 6176 Received: from heian.cn.fujitsu.com (mail.cn.fujitsu.com [183.91.158.132]) by imf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 07:38:01 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,471,1583164800"; d="scan'208";a="93814171" Received: from unknown (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 04 Jun 2020 15:37:58 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.204]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E00950A9975; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 15:37:58 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.167.225.141] (10.167.225.141) by G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 15:37:58 +0800 Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IOWbnuWkjTogUmU6IFtSRkMgUEFUQ0ggMC84XSBkYXg6IEFkZCBh?= =?UTF-8?Q?_dax-rmap_tree_to_support_reflink?= To: Dave Chinner CC: Matthew Wilcox , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "darrick.wong@oracle.com" , "dan.j.williams@intel.com" , "hch@lst.de" , "rgoldwyn@suse.de" , "Qi, Fuli" , "Gotou, Yasunori" References: <20200427084750.136031-1-ruansy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20200427122836.GD29705@bombadil.infradead.org> <20200428064318.GG2040@dread.disaster.area> From: Ruan Shiyang Message-ID: <153e13e6-8685-fb0d-6bd3-bb553c06bf51@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 15:37:42 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200428064318.GG2040@dread.disaster.area> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.167.225.141] X-ClientProxiedBy: G08CNEXCHPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.203) To G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.204) X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: 4E00950A9975.AB7F6 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: ruansy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7B7A21803F9AA X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 2020/4/28 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=882:43, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 06:09:47AM +0000, Ruan, Shiyang wrote: >> >> =E5=9C=A8 2020/4/27 20:28:36, "Matthew Wilcox" =E5= =86=99=E9=81=93: >> >>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 04:47:42PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote: >>>> This patchset is a try to resolve the shared 'page cache' problem = for >>>> fsdax. >>>> >>>> In order to track multiple mappings and indexes on one page, I >>>> introduced a dax-rmap rb-tree to manage the relationship. A dax e= ntry >>>> will be associated more than once if is shared. At the second tim= e we >>>> associate this entry, we create this rb-tree and store its root in >>>> page->private(not used in fsdax). Insert (->mapping, ->index) whe= n >>>> dax_associate_entry() and delete it when dax_disassociate_entry(). >>> >>> Do we really want to track all of this on a per-page basis? I would >>> have thought a per-extent basis was more useful. Essentially, create >>> a new address_space for each shared extent. Per page just seems like >>> a huge overhead. >>> >> Per-extent tracking is a nice idea for me. I haven't thought of it >> yet... >> >> But the extent info is maintained by filesystem. I think we need a wa= y >> to obtain this info from FS when associating a page. May be a bit >> complicated. Let me think about it... >=20 > That's why I want the -user of this association- to do a filesystem > callout instead of keeping it's own naive tracking infrastructure. > The filesystem can do an efficient, on-demand reverse mapping lookup > from it's own extent tracking infrastructure, and there's zero > runtime overhead when there are no errors present. Hi Dave, I ran into some difficulties when trying to implement the per-extent=20 rmap tracking. So, I re-read your comments and found that I was=20 misunderstanding what you described here. I think what you mean is: we don't need the in-memory dax-rmap tracking=20 now. Just ask the FS for the owner's information that associate with=20 one page when memory-failure. So, the per-page (even per-extent)=20 dax-rmap is needless in this case. Is this right? Based on this, we only need to store the extent information of a fsdax=20 page in its ->mapping (by searching from FS). Then obtain the owners of=20 this page (also by searching from FS) when memory-failure or other rmap=20 case occurs. So, a fsdax page is no longer associated with a specific file, but with=20 a FS(or the pmem device). I think it's easier to understand and implemen= t. -- Thanks, Ruan Shiyang. >=20 > At the moment, this "dax association" is used to "report" a storage > media error directly to userspace. I say "report" because what it > does is kill userspace processes dead. The storage media error > actually needs to be reported to the owner of the storage media, > which in the case of FS-DAX is the filesytem. >=20 > That way the filesystem can then look up all the owners of that bad > media range (i.e. the filesystem block it corresponds to) and take > appropriate action. e.g. >=20 > - if it falls in filesytem metadata, shutdown the filesystem > - if it falls in user data, call the "kill userspace dead" routines > for each mapping/index tuple the filesystem finds for the given > LBA address that the media error occurred. >=20 > Right now if the media error is in filesystem metadata, the > filesystem isn't even told about it. The filesystem can't even shut > down - the error is just dropped on the floor and it won't be until > the filesystem next tries to reference that metadata that we notice > there is an issue. >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Dave. >=20