linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: david@fromorbit.com, darrick.wong@oracle.com
Cc: sandeen@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 00/29] fs: fixes for serious clone/dedupe problems
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:44:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <153981625504.5568.2708520119290577378.stgit@magnolia> (raw)

Hi all,

Dave, Eric, and I have been chasing a stale data exposure bug in the XFS
reflink implementation, and tracked it down to reflink forgetting to do
some of the file-extending activities that must happen for regular
writes.

We then started auditing the clone, dedupe, and copyfile code and
realized that from a file contents perspective, clonerange isn't any
different from a regular file write.  Unfortunately, we also noticed
that *unlike* a regular write, clonerange skips a ton of overflow
checks, such as validating the ranges against s_maxbytes, MAX_NON_LFS,
and RLIMIT_FSIZE.  We also observed that cloning into a file did not
strip security privileges (suid, capabilities) like a regular write
would.  I also noticed that xfs and ocfs2 need to dump the page cache
before remapping blocks, not after.

In fixing the range checking problems I also realized that both dedupe
and copyfile tell userspace how much of the requested operation was
acted upon.  Since the range validation can shorten a clone request (or
we can ENOSPC midway through), we might as well plumb the short
operation reporting back through the VFS indirection code to userspace.
I added a few more cleanups to the xfs code per reviewer suggestions.

So, here's the whole giant pile of patches[1] that fix all the problems.
This branch is against current upstream (4.19-rc8).  The patch
"generic: test reflink side effects" recently sent to fstests exercises
the fixes in this series.  Tests are in [2].

--D

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/djwong/xfs-linux.git/log/?h=djwong-devel
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/djwong/xfstests-dev.git/log/?h=djwong-devel

             reply	other threads:[~2018-10-17 22:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-17 22:44 Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-10-17 22:44 ` [PATCH 01/29] vfs: vfs_clone_file_prep_inodes should return EINVAL for a clone from beyond EOF Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:44 ` [PATCH 02/29] vfs: check file ranges before cloning files Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:44 ` [PATCH 03/29] vfs: exit early from zero length remap operations Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:44 ` [PATCH 04/29] vfs: strengthen checking of file range inputs to generic_remap_checks Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-18  0:41   ` Al Viro
2018-10-18  4:37     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-18 18:56   ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:44 ` [PATCH 05/29] vfs: avoid problematic remapping requests into partial EOF block Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:44 ` [PATCH 06/29] vfs: skip zero-length dedupe requests Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:45 ` [PATCH 07/29] vfs: rename vfs_clone_file_prep to be more descriptive Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:45 ` [PATCH 08/29] vfs: rename clone_verify_area to remap_verify_area Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:45 ` [PATCH 09/29] vfs: combine the clone and dedupe into a single remap_file_range Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-18  0:48   ` Al Viro
2018-10-18  4:47     ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-18  4:54       ` Al Viro
2018-10-18  5:03         ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-18 18:57   ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:45 ` [PATCH 10/29] vfs: pass remap flags to generic_remap_file_range_prep Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:45 ` [PATCH 11/29] vfs: pass remap flags to generic_remap_checks Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:45 ` [PATCH 12/29] vfs: remap helper should update destination inode metadata Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:45 ` [PATCH 13/29] vfs: make remap_file_range functions take and return bytes completed Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-18 18:57   ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:45 ` [PATCH 14/29] vfs: plumb remap flags through the vfs clone functions Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:46 ` [PATCH 15/29] vfs: plumb remap flags through the vfs dedupe functions Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:46 ` [PATCH 16/29] vfs: enable remap callers that can handle short operations Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-18 18:58   ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:46 ` [PATCH 17/29] vfs: hide file range comparison function Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:46 ` [PATCH 18/29] vfs: clean up generic_remap_file_range_prep return value Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:46 ` [PATCH 19/29] ocfs2: truncate page cache for clone destination file before remapping Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:46 ` [PATCH 20/29] ocfs2: fix pagecache truncation prior to reflink Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:46 ` [PATCH 21/29] ocfs2: support partial clone range and dedupe range Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:46 ` [PATCH 22/29] ocfs2: remove ocfs2_reflink_remap_range Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:46 ` [PATCH 23/29] xfs: add a per-xfs trace_printk macro Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:47 ` [PATCH 24/29] xfs: fix pagecache truncation prior to reflink Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:47 ` [PATCH 25/29] xfs: clean up xfs_reflink_remap_blocks call site Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:47 ` [PATCH 26/29] xfs: support returning partial reflink results Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:47 ` [PATCH 27/29] xfs: remove redundant remap partial EOF block checks Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:47 ` [PATCH 28/29] xfs: remove xfs_reflink_remap_range Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-17 22:47 ` [PATCH 29/29] xfs: remove [cm]time update from reflink calls Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=153981625504.5568.2708520119290577378.stgit@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox