From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Subject: [PATCH] mm,oom: Remove wake_oom_reaper().
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 22:19:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1533302350-3398-1-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
Currently, wake_oom_reaper() is checking whether an OOM victim thread is
already chained to the OOM victim list. But chaining one thread from each
OOM victim process is sufficient.
Since mark_oom_victim() sets signal->oom_mm for one thread from each OOM
victim process, we can chain that OOM victim thread there. Since oom_lock
is held during __oom_kill_process(), by replacing oom_reaper_lock with
oom_lock, it becomes safe to use mark_oom_victim() even if MMF_OOM_SKIP is
later set due to is_global_init() case.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 41 ++++++++++-------------------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 0e10b86..dad0409 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -486,7 +486,6 @@ bool process_shares_mm(struct task_struct *p, struct mm_struct *mm)
static struct task_struct *oom_reaper_th;
static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(oom_reaper_wait);
static struct task_struct *oom_reaper_list;
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(oom_reaper_lock);
bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
@@ -607,7 +606,7 @@ static void oom_reap_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
*/
set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags);
- /* Drop a reference taken by wake_oom_reaper */
+ /* Drop a reference taken by mark_oom_victim(). */
put_task_struct(tsk);
}
@@ -617,12 +616,12 @@ static int oom_reaper(void *unused)
struct task_struct *tsk = NULL;
wait_event_freezable(oom_reaper_wait, oom_reaper_list != NULL);
- spin_lock(&oom_reaper_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&oom_lock);
if (oom_reaper_list != NULL) {
tsk = oom_reaper_list;
oom_reaper_list = tsk->oom_reaper_list;
}
- spin_unlock(&oom_reaper_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&oom_lock);
if (tsk)
oom_reap_task(tsk);
@@ -631,32 +630,12 @@ static int oom_reaper(void *unused)
return 0;
}
-static void wake_oom_reaper(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
- /* tsk is already queued? */
- if (tsk == oom_reaper_list || tsk->oom_reaper_list)
- return;
-
- get_task_struct(tsk);
-
- spin_lock(&oom_reaper_lock);
- tsk->oom_reaper_list = oom_reaper_list;
- oom_reaper_list = tsk;
- spin_unlock(&oom_reaper_lock);
- trace_wake_reaper(tsk->pid);
- wake_up(&oom_reaper_wait);
-}
-
static int __init oom_init(void)
{
oom_reaper_th = kthread_run(oom_reaper, NULL, "oom_reaper");
return 0;
}
subsys_initcall(oom_init)
-#else
-static inline void wake_oom_reaper(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-}
#endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
/**
@@ -682,6 +661,13 @@ static void mark_oom_victim(struct task_struct *tsk)
if (!cmpxchg(&tsk->signal->oom_mm, NULL, mm)) {
mmgrab(tsk->signal->oom_mm);
set_bit(MMF_OOM_VICTIM, &mm->flags);
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
+ get_task_struct(tsk);
+ tsk->oom_reaper_list = oom_reaper_list;
+ oom_reaper_list = tsk;
+ trace_wake_reaper(tsk->pid);
+ wake_up(&oom_reaper_wait);
+#endif
}
/*
@@ -833,7 +819,6 @@ static void __oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *victim)
{
struct task_struct *p;
struct mm_struct *mm;
- bool can_oom_reap = true;
p = find_lock_task_mm(victim);
if (!p) {
@@ -883,7 +868,6 @@ static void __oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *victim)
if (same_thread_group(p, victim))
continue;
if (is_global_init(p)) {
- can_oom_reap = false;
set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags);
pr_info("oom killer %d (%s) has mm pinned by %d (%s)\n",
task_pid_nr(victim), victim->comm,
@@ -900,9 +884,6 @@ static void __oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *victim)
}
rcu_read_unlock();
- if (can_oom_reap)
- wake_oom_reaper(victim);
-
mmdrop(mm);
put_task_struct(victim);
}
@@ -941,7 +922,6 @@ static void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, const char *message)
task_lock(p);
if (task_will_free_mem(p)) {
mark_oom_victim(p);
- wake_oom_reaper(p);
task_unlock(p);
put_task_struct(p);
return;
@@ -1071,7 +1051,6 @@ bool out_of_memory(struct oom_control *oc)
*/
if (task_will_free_mem(current)) {
mark_oom_victim(current);
- wake_oom_reaper(current);
return true;
}
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-08-03 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-03 13:19 Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2018-08-06 8:21 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1533302350-3398-1-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox