From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl0-f69.google.com (mail-pl0-f69.google.com [209.85.160.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B786B0010 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 17:06:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pl0-f69.google.com with SMTP id y2-v6so5812402pll.16 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:06:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com. [192.55.52.151]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z125-v6si3867945pfz.10.2018.07.11.14.06.15 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:06:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1531342956.15351.38.camel@intel.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 27/27] x86/cet: Add arch_prctl functions for CET From: Yu-cheng Yu Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:02:36 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <20180710222639.8241-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20180710222639.8241-28-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Florian Weimer , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Vedvyas Shanbhogue On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 14:19 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 07/11/2018 12:26 AM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: > > > > arch_prctl(ARCH_CET_DISABLE, unsigned long features) > > A A A A A Disable SHSTK and/or IBT specified in 'features'.A A Return > > -EPERM > > A A A A A if CET is locked out. > > > > arch_prctl(ARCH_CET_LOCK) > > A A A A A Lock out CET feature. > Isn't it a a??lock ina?? rather than a a??lock outa??? Yes, that makes more sense. A I will fix it.