Re: gigantic hugepages vs. movable zones

["Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On 07/27/2017 12:58 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 27-07-17 07:52:08, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I've just noticed that alloc_gigantic_page ignores movability of the
>>> gigantic page and it uses any existing zone. Considering that
>>> hugepage_migration_supported only supports 2MB and pgd level hugepages
>>> then 1GB pages are not migratable and as such allocating them from a
>>> movable zone will break the basic expectation of this zone. Standard
>>> hugetlb allocations try to avoid that by using htlb_alloc_mask and I
>>> believe we should do the same for gigantic pages as well.
>>>
>>> I suspect this behavior is not intentional. What do you think about the
>>> following untested patch?
>>
>>
>> I also noticed an unrelated issue with the usage of
>> start_isolate_page_range. On error we set the migrate type to
>> MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
> 
> Why that should be a problem? I think it is perfectly OK to have
> MIGRATE_MOVABLE pageblocks inside kernel zones.
> 

we can pick pages with migrate type movable and if we fail to isolate 
won't we set the migrate type of that pages to MOVABLE ?

-aneesh

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>