From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl0-f69.google.com (mail-pl0-f69.google.com [209.85.160.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50376B027A for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 07:49:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pl0-f69.google.com with SMTP id q18-v6so8305094pll.3 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 04:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org. [198.145.29.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y20-v6si12705759pll.76.2018.06.17.04.49.22 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 17 Jun 2018 04:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Patch "x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test" has been added to the 4.16-stable tree From: Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 13:23:53 +0200 Message-ID: <152923463366112@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: 20180509171348.9EEE4BEF@viggo.jf.intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alexander.levin@microsoft.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxram@us.ibm.com, mingo@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, peterz@infradead.org, shuah@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: stable-commits@vger.kernel.org This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test to the 4.16-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: x86-pkeys-selftests-add-prot_exec-test.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.16 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let know about it. >>From foo@baz Sun Jun 17 12:07:34 CEST 2018 From: Dave Hansen Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:13:48 -0700 Subject: x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test From: Dave Hansen [ Upstream commit 6af17cf89e99b64cf1f660bf848755442ab2f047 ] Under the covers, implement executable-only memory with protection keys when userspace calls mprotect(PROT_EXEC). But, we did not have a selftest for that. Now we do. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Michael Ellermen Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ram Pai Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171348.9EEE4BEF@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+) --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c @@ -1303,6 +1303,49 @@ void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory expected_pk_fault(pkey); } +void test_implicit_mprotect_exec_only_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey) +{ + void *p1; + int scratch; + int ptr_contents; + int ret; + + dprintf1("%s() start\n", __func__); + + p1 = get_pointer_to_instructions(); + lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch); + ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1); + dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents); + + /* Use a *normal* mprotect(), not mprotect_pkey(): */ + ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_EXEC); + pkey_assert(!ret); + + dprintf2("pkru: %x\n", rdpkru()); + + /* Make sure this is an *instruction* fault */ + madvise(p1, PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED); + lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch); + do_not_expect_pk_fault("executing on PROT_EXEC memory"); + ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1); + dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents); + expected_pk_fault(UNKNOWN_PKEY); + + /* + * Put the memory back to non-PROT_EXEC. Should clear the + * exec-only pkey off the VMA and allow it to be readable + * again. Go to PROT_NONE first to check for a kernel bug + * that did not clear the pkey when doing PROT_NONE. + */ + ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE); + pkey_assert(!ret); + + ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC); + pkey_assert(!ret); + ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1); + do_not_expect_pk_fault("plain read on recently PROT_EXEC area"); +} + void test_mprotect_pkey_on_unsupported_cpu(int *ptr, u16 pkey) { int size = PAGE_SIZE; @@ -1327,6 +1370,7 @@ void (*pkey_tests[])(int *ptr, u16 pkey) test_kernel_gup_of_access_disabled_region, test_kernel_gup_write_to_write_disabled_region, test_executing_on_unreadable_memory, + test_implicit_mprotect_exec_only_memory, test_ptrace_of_child, test_pkey_syscalls_on_non_allocated_pkey, test_pkey_syscalls_bad_args, Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from dave.hansen@linux.intel.com are queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-factor-out-instruction-page.patch queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-fix-pointer-math.patch queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-adjust-the-self-test-to-fresh-distros-that-export-the-pkeys-abi.patch queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-add-a-test-for-pkey-0.patch queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-stop-using-assert.patch queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-save-off-prot-for-allocations.patch queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-remove-dead-debugging-code-fix-dprint_in_signal.patch queue-4.16/x86-mpx-selftests-adjust-the-self-test-to-fresh-distros-that-export-the-mpx-abi.patch queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-add-prot_exec-test.patch queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-allow-faults-on-unknown-keys.patch queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-give-better-unexpected-fault-error-messages.patch queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-avoid-printf-in-signal-deadlocks.patch queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-fix-pkey-exhaustion-test-off-by-one.patch