From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: 20180509171348.9EEE4BEF@viggo.jf.intel.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, alexander.levin@microsoft.com,
dave.hansen@intel.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linuxram@us.ibm.com, mingo@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
peterz@infradead.org, shuah@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: stable-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Patch "x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test" has been added to the 4.16-stable tree
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 13:23:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152923463366112@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test
to the 4.16-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
x86-pkeys-selftests-add-prot_exec-test.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.16 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Sun Jun 17 12:07:34 CEST 2018
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:13:48 -0700
Subject: x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
[ Upstream commit 6af17cf89e99b64cf1f660bf848755442ab2f047 ]
Under the covers, implement executable-only memory with
protection keys when userspace calls mprotect(PROT_EXEC).
But, we did not have a selftest for that. Now we do.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171348.9EEE4BEF@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -1303,6 +1303,49 @@ void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory
expected_pk_fault(pkey);
}
+void test_implicit_mprotect_exec_only_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
+{
+ void *p1;
+ int scratch;
+ int ptr_contents;
+ int ret;
+
+ dprintf1("%s() start\n", __func__);
+
+ p1 = get_pointer_to_instructions();
+ lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch);
+ ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
+ dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);
+
+ /* Use a *normal* mprotect(), not mprotect_pkey(): */
+ ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_EXEC);
+ pkey_assert(!ret);
+
+ dprintf2("pkru: %x\n", rdpkru());
+
+ /* Make sure this is an *instruction* fault */
+ madvise(p1, PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED);
+ lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch);
+ do_not_expect_pk_fault("executing on PROT_EXEC memory");
+ ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
+ dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);
+ expected_pk_fault(UNKNOWN_PKEY);
+
+ /*
+ * Put the memory back to non-PROT_EXEC. Should clear the
+ * exec-only pkey off the VMA and allow it to be readable
+ * again. Go to PROT_NONE first to check for a kernel bug
+ * that did not clear the pkey when doing PROT_NONE.
+ */
+ ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE);
+ pkey_assert(!ret);
+
+ ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC);
+ pkey_assert(!ret);
+ ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
+ do_not_expect_pk_fault("plain read on recently PROT_EXEC area");
+}
+
void test_mprotect_pkey_on_unsupported_cpu(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
{
int size = PAGE_SIZE;
@@ -1327,6 +1370,7 @@ void (*pkey_tests[])(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
test_kernel_gup_of_access_disabled_region,
test_kernel_gup_write_to_write_disabled_region,
test_executing_on_unreadable_memory,
+ test_implicit_mprotect_exec_only_memory,
test_ptrace_of_child,
test_pkey_syscalls_on_non_allocated_pkey,
test_pkey_syscalls_bad_args,
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from dave.hansen@linux.intel.com are
queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-factor-out-instruction-page.patch
queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-fix-pointer-math.patch
queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-adjust-the-self-test-to-fresh-distros-that-export-the-pkeys-abi.patch
queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-add-a-test-for-pkey-0.patch
queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-stop-using-assert.patch
queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-save-off-prot-for-allocations.patch
queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-remove-dead-debugging-code-fix-dprint_in_signal.patch
queue-4.16/x86-mpx-selftests-adjust-the-self-test-to-fresh-distros-that-export-the-mpx-abi.patch
queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-add-prot_exec-test.patch
queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-allow-faults-on-unknown-keys.patch
queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-give-better-unexpected-fault-error-messages.patch
queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-avoid-printf-in-signal-deadlocks.patch
queue-4.16/x86-pkeys-selftests-fix-pkey-exhaustion-test-off-by-one.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-06-17 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152923463366112@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=20180509171348.9EEE4BEF@viggo.jf.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.levin@microsoft.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox