From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl0-f69.google.com (mail-pl0-f69.google.com [209.85.160.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CD36B026F for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 11:52:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pl0-f69.google.com with SMTP id y7-v6so5597937plt.17 for ; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 08:52:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com. [134.134.136.100]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a80-v6si18999175pfg.200.2018.06.07.08.52.32 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Jun 2018 08:52:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1528386560.4636.2.camel@2b52.sc.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Documentation/x86: Add CET description From: Yu-cheng Yu Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 08:49:20 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <20180607143544.3477-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20180607143544.3477-6-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: LKML , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Linux-MM , linux-arch , X86 ML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. J. Lu" , "Shanbhogue, Vedvyas" , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Dave Hansen , Jonathan Corbet , Oleg Nesterov , Arnd Bergmann , mike.kravetz@oracle.com On Thu, 2018-06-07 at 08:39 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 7:40 AM Yu-cheng Yu wrote: > > Fix the subject line, please. This is more than just docs. > > > > > Explain how CET works and the noshstk/noibt kernel parameters. > > Maybe no_cet_shstk and no_cet_ibt? noshstk sounds like gibberish and > people might need a reminder. I will change that. Yu-cheng