From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com,
shakeelb@google.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
mhocko@kernel.org, ktkhai@virtuozzo.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
pombredanne@nexb.com, stummala@codeaurora.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, guro@fb.com,
mka@chromium.org, penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp,
chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, longman@redhat.com, minchan@kernel.org,
ying.huang@intel.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net, jbacik@fb.com,
linux@roeck-us.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, willy@infradead.org, lirongqing@baidu.com,
aryabinin@virtuozzo.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 14/14] mm: Clear shrinker bit if there are no objects related to memcg
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 15:14:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152457206121.22533.14178814305402011694.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <152457151556.22533.5742587589232401708.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
To avoid further unneed calls of do_shrink_slab()
for shrinkers, which already do not have any charged
objects in a memcg, their bits have to be cleared.
This patch introduces a lockless mechanism to do that
without races without parallel list lru add. After
do_shrink_slab() returns SHRINK_EMPTY the first time,
we clear the bit and call it once again. Then we restore
the bit, if the new return value is different.
Note, that single smp_mb__after_atomic() in shrink_slab_memcg()
covers two situations:
1)list_lru_add() shrink_slab_memcg
list_add_tail() for_each_set_bit() <--- read bit
do_shrink_slab() <--- missed list update (no barrier)
<MB> <MB>
set_bit() do_shrink_slab() <--- seen list update
This situation, when the first do_shrink_slab() sees set bit,
but it doesn't see list update (i.e., race with the first element
queueing), is rare. So we don't add <MB> before the first call
of do_shrink_slab() instead of this to do not slow down generic
case. Also, it's need the second call as seen in below in (2).
2)list_lru_add() shrink_slab_memcg()
list_add_tail() ...
set_bit() ...
... for_each_set_bit()
do_shrink_slab() do_shrink_slab()
clear_bit() ...
... ...
list_lru_add() ...
list_add_tail() clear_bit()
<MB> <MB>
set_bit() do_shrink_slab()
The barriers guarantees, the second do_shrink_slab()
in the right side task sees list update if really
cleared the bit. This case is drawn in the code comment.
[Results/performance of the patchset]
After the whole patchset applied the below test shows signify
increase of performance:
$echo 1 > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/memory.use_hierarchy
$mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/ct
$echo 4000M > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/ct/memory.kmem.limit_in_bytes
$for i in `seq 0 4000`; do mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/ct/$i; echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/ct/$i/cgroup.procs; mkdir -p s/$i; mount -t tmpfs $i s/$i; touch s/$i/file; done
Then, 5 sequential calls of drop caches:
$time echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
1)Before:
0.00user 13.78system 0:13.78elapsed 99%CPU
0.00user 5.59system 0:05.60elapsed 99%CPU
0.00user 5.48system 0:05.48elapsed 99%CPU
0.00user 8.35system 0:08.35elapsed 99%CPU
0.00user 8.34system 0:08.35elapsed 99%CPU
2)After
0.00user 1.10system 0:01.10elapsed 99%CPU
0.00user 0.00system 0:00.01elapsed 64%CPU
0.00user 0.01system 0:00.01elapsed 82%CPU
0.00user 0.00system 0:00.01elapsed 64%CPU
0.00user 0.01system 0:00.01elapsed 82%CPU
The results show the performance increases at least in 548 times.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 2 ++
mm/vmscan.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 7b9529534e00..94d9884caf61 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -1251,6 +1251,8 @@ static inline void memcg_set_shrinker_bit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid, int
rcu_read_lock();
map = MEMCG_SHRINKER_MAP(memcg, nid);
+ /* Pairs with smp mb in shrink_slab() */
+ smp_mb__before_atomic();
set_bit(nr, map->map);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index f57f2893d58e..aba3977cde3e 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -586,8 +586,23 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
continue;
ret = do_shrink_slab(&sc, shrinker, priority);
- if (ret == SHRINK_EMPTY)
- ret = 0;
+ if (ret == SHRINK_EMPTY) {
+ clear_bit(i, map->map);
+ /*
+ * Pairs with mb in memcg_set_shrinker_bit():
+ *
+ * list_lru_add() shrink_slab_memcg()
+ * list_add_tail() clear_bit()
+ * <MB> <MB>
+ * set_bit() do_shrink_slab()
+ */
+ smp_mb__after_atomic();
+ ret = do_shrink_slab(&sc, shrinker, priority);
+ if (ret == SHRINK_EMPTY)
+ ret = 0;
+ else
+ memcg_set_shrinker_bit(memcg, nid, i);
+ }
freed += ret;
if (rwsem_is_contended(&shrinker_rwsem)) {
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-24 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-24 12:11 [PATCH v3 00/14] Improve shrink_slab() scalability (old complexity was O(n^2), new is O(n)) Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-24 12:12 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] mm: Assign id to every memcg-aware shrinker Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-24 12:12 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] memcg: Refactoring in mem_cgroup_alloc() Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-24 12:12 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] memcg: Refactoring in alloc_mem_cgroup_per_node_info() Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-24 12:12 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] mm: Assign memcg-aware shrinkers bitmap to memcg Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-24 12:12 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] mm: Refactoring in workingset_init() Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] fs: Refactoring in alloc_super() Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] fs: Propagate shrinker::id to list_lru Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] list_lru: Add memcg argument to list_lru_from_kmem() Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] list_lru: Pass dst_memcg argument to memcg_drain_list_lru_node() Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] list_lru: Pass lru " Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] mm: Set bit in memcg shrinker bitmap on first list_lru item apearance Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] mm: Iterate only over charged shrinkers during memcg shrink_slab() Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-24 12:14 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] mm: Add SHRINK_EMPTY shrinker methods return value Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-24 12:14 ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152457206121.22533.14178814305402011694.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=stummala@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox