linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@oracle.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, brouer@redhat.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Move kfree_call_rcu() to slab_common.c
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 22:46:13 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1515134773.21222.13.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180105000707.GA22237@bombadil.infradead.org>

On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 16:07 -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 03:47:32PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > I was under the impression that typeof did not actually evaluate its
> > argument, but rather only returned its type.  And there are a few macros
> > with this pattern in mainline.
> > 
> > Or am I confused about what typeof does?
> 
> I think checkpatch is confused by the '*' in the typeof argument:
> 
> $ git diff |./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict
> CHECK: Macro argument reuse 'ptr' - possible side-effects?
> #29: FILE: include/linux/rcupdate.h:896:
> +#define kfree_rcu(ptr, rcu_head)                                        \
> +	__kfree_rcu(&((ptr)->rcu_head), offsetof(typeof(*(ptr)), rcu_head))
> 
> If one removes the '*', the warning goes away.
> 
> I'm no perlista, but Joe, would this regexp modification make sense?
> 
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -4957,7 +4957,7 @@ sub process {
>                                 next if ($arg =~ /\.\.\./);
>                                 next if ($arg =~ /^type$/i);
>                                 my $tmp_stmt = $define_stmt;
> -                               $tmp_stmt =~ s/\b(typeof|__typeof__|__builtin\w+|typecheck\s*\(\s*$Type\s*,|\#+)\s*\(*\s*$arg\s*\)*\b//g;
> +                               $tmp_stmt =~ s/\b(typeof|__typeof__|__builtin\w+|typecheck\s*\(\s*$Type\s*,|\#+)\s*\(*\**\(*\s*$arg\s*\)*\b//g;

I supposed ideally it'd be more like

$tmp_stmt =~ s/\b(?:typeof|__typeof__|__builtin\w+|typecheck\s*\(\s*$Type\s*,|\#+)\s*\(*(?:\s*\*\s*)*\s*\(*\s*$arg\s*\)*\b//g;

Adding ?: at the start to not capture and
(?:\s*\*\s*)* for any number of * with any
surrounding spacings.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-05  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-02 20:11 rao.shoaib
2018-01-02 20:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] kfree_rcu() should use the new kfree_bulk() interface for freeing rcu structures rao.shoaib
2018-01-02 22:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] Move kfree_call_rcu() to slab_common.c Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-02 22:49   ` Rao Shoaib
2018-01-04  1:38     ` Boqun Feng
2018-01-04 20:35       ` Rao Shoaib
2018-01-04 21:27         ` Rao Shoaib
2018-01-04 21:46           ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-04 22:18             ` Rao Shoaib
2018-01-04 23:13               ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-04 23:47                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-05  0:07                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-05  2:14                     ` Rao Shoaib
2018-01-05  6:46                     ` Joe Perches [this message]
2018-03-27  1:56                       ` Rao Shoaib
2018-03-27  2:06                         ` Joe Perches
2018-04-02  5:31 [PATCH 0/2] Move kfree_rcu out of rcu code and use kfree_bulk rao.shoaib
2018-04-02  5:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] Move kfree_call_rcu() to slab_common.c rao.shoaib
2018-04-02  7:59   ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-02  9:45   ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-02 15:43     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-03 17:22 [PATCH 0/2] Move kfree_rcu out of rcu code and use kfree_bulk rao.shoaib
2018-04-03 17:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] Move kfree_call_rcu() to slab_common.c rao.shoaib

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1515134773.21222.13.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rao.shoaib@oracle.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox