From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: Introduce CROSSRELEASE_STACK_TRACE and make it not unwind as default
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 18:13:25 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1508318006-2090-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> (raw)
Johan Hovold reported a performance regression by crossrelease like:
> Boot time (from "Linux version" to login prompt) had in fact doubled
> since 4.13 where it took 17 seconds (with my current config) compared to
> the 35 seconds I now see with 4.14-rc4.
>
> I quick bisect pointed to lockdep and specifically the following commit:
>
> 28a903f63ec0 ("locking/lockdep: Handle non(or multi)-acquisition
> of a crosslock")
>
> which I've verified is the commit which doubled the boot time (compared
> to 28a903f63ec0^) (added by lockdep crossrelease series [1]).
Currently crossrelease performs unwind on every acquisition. But, that
overloads systems too much. So this patch makes unwind optional and set
it to N as default. Instead, it records only acquire_ip normally. Of
course, unwind is sometimes required for full analysis. In that case, we
can set CROSSRELEASE_STACK_TRACE to Y and use it.
In my qemu ubuntu machin (x86_64, 4 cores, 512M), the regression was
fixed like, measuring timestamp of "Freeing unused kernel memory":
1. No lockdep enabled
Average : 1.543353 secs
2. Lockdep enabled
Average : 1.570806 secs
3. Lockdep enabled + crossrelease enabled
Average : 1.870317 secs
4. Lockdep enabled + crossrelease enabled + this patch applied
Average : 1.574143 secs
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
---
include/linux/lockdep.h | 4 ++++
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 5 +++++
lib/Kconfig.debug | 15 +++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index bfa8e0b..70358b5 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -278,7 +278,11 @@ struct held_lock {
};
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE
+#ifdef CONFIG_CROSSRELEASE_STACK_TRACE
#define MAX_XHLOCK_TRACE_ENTRIES 5
+#else
+#define MAX_XHLOCK_TRACE_ENTRIES 1
+#endif
/*
* This is for keeping locks waiting for commit so that true dependencies
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index e36e652..5c2ddf2 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -4863,8 +4863,13 @@ static void add_xhlock(struct held_lock *hlock)
xhlock->trace.nr_entries = 0;
xhlock->trace.max_entries = MAX_XHLOCK_TRACE_ENTRIES;
xhlock->trace.entries = xhlock->trace_entries;
+#ifdef CONFIG_CROSSRELEASE_STACK_TRACE
xhlock->trace.skip = 3;
save_stack_trace(&xhlock->trace);
+#else
+ xhlock->trace.nr_entries = 1;
+ xhlock->trace.entries[0] = hlock->acquire_ip;
+#endif
}
static inline int same_context_xhlock(struct hist_lock *xhlock)
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 3db9167..5be7bdd 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1225,6 +1225,21 @@ config LOCKDEP_COMPLETIONS
A deadlock caused by wait_for_completion() and complete() can be
detected by lockdep using crossrelease feature.
+config CROSSRELEASE_STACK_TRACE
+ bool "Record more than one entity of stack trace in crossrelease"
+ depends on LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE
+ default n
+ help
+ Crossrelease feature needs to record stack traces for all
+ acquisitions for later use. And only acquire_ip is normally
+ recorded because the unwind operation is too expensive. However,
+ sometimes more than acquire_ip are required for full analysis.
+ In the case that we need to record more than one entity of
+ stack trace using unwind, this feature would be useful, with
+ taking more overhead.
+
+ If unsure, say N.
+
config DEBUG_LOCKDEP
bool "Lock dependency engine debugging"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && LOCKDEP
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2017-10-18 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-18 9:13 Byungchul Park [this message]
2017-10-18 9:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] lockdep: Remove BROKEN flag of LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE Byungchul Park
2017-10-18 10:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-19 1:58 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-18 10:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: Introduce CROSSRELEASE_STACK_TRACE and make it not unwind as default Ingo Molnar
2017-10-19 4:32 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-19 5:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-19 6:11 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-19 6:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-19 6:36 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-19 8:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-19 6:22 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-19 8:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-19 9:02 ` 박병철/선임연구원/SW Platform(연)AOT팀(byungchul.park@lge.com)
2017-10-19 9:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-18 13:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-18 13:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-18 13:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-18 14:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-10-18 14:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-18 17:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-19 2:00 ` Byungchul Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1508318006-2090-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com \
--to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox