From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
To: zhongjinji <zhongjinji@honor.com>, hannes@cmpxchg.org
Cc: Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
axelrasmussen@google.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
chenridong@huawei.com, corbet@lwn.net, david@kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
lujialin4@huawei.com, mhocko@suse.com, muchun.song@linux.dev,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, rppt@kernel.org,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, surenb@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
weixugc@google.com, yuanchu@google.com, yuzhao@google.com,
zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH -next 1/2] mm/mglru: use mem_cgroup_iter for global reclaim
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 10:35:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14b2584b-3ac7-4358-9d81-40ca32683e4f@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251205025727.8324-1-zhongjinji@honor.com>
On 2025/12/5 10:57, zhongjinji wrote:
>> From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
>>
>> The memcg LRU was originally introduced for global reclaim to enhance
>> scalability. However, its implementation complexity has led to performance
>> regressions when dealing with a large number of memory cgroups [1].
>>
>> As suggested by Johannes [1], this patch adopts mem_cgroup_iter with
>> cookie-based iteration for global reclaim, aligning with the approach
>> already used in shrink_node_memcgs. This simplification removes the
>> dedicated memcg LRU tracking while maintaining the core functionality.
>>
>> It performed a stress test based on Zhao Yu's methodology [2] on a
>> 1 TB, 4-node NUMA system. The results are summarized below:
>>
>> memcg LRU memcg iter
>> stddev(pgsteal) / mean(pgsteal) 91.2% 75.7%
>> sum(pgsteal) / sum(requested) 216.4% 230.5%
>
> Are there more data available? For example, the load of kswapd or the refault values.
>
> I am concerned about these two data points because Yu Zhao's implementation controls
> the fairness of aging through memcg gen (get_memcg_gen). This helps reduce excessive
> aging for certain cgroups, which is beneficial for kswapd's power consumption.
>
> At the same time, pages that age earlier can be considered colder pages (in the entire system),
> so reclaiming them should also help with the refault values.
>
I re-ran the test and observed a 3.2% increase in refaults. Is this enough for what you were
concerned about?
The complete data set is offered in my earlier email:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/e657d5ac-6f92-4dbb-bf32-76084988d024@huaweicloud.com/
>> The new implementation demonstrates a significant improvement in
>> fairness, reducing the standard deviation relative to the mean by
>> 15.5 percentage points. While the reclaim accuracy shows a slight
>> increase in overscan (from 85086871 to 90633890, 6.5%).
>>
>> The primary benefits of this change are:
>> 1. Simplified codebase by removing custom memcg LRU infrastructure
>> 2. Improved fairness in memory reclaim across multiple cgroups
>> 3. Better performance when creating many memory cgroups
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251126171513.GC135004@cmpxchg.org
>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221222041905.2431096-7-yuzhao@google.com
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
--
Best regards,
Ridong
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-08 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-04 12:31 [RFC PATCH -next 0/2] mm/mglru: remove memcg lru Chen Ridong
2025-12-04 12:31 ` [RFC PATCH -next 1/2] mm/mglru: use mem_cgroup_iter for global reclaim Chen Ridong
2025-12-04 18:28 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-12-04 22:29 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-12-08 2:26 ` Chen Ridong
2025-12-08 3:10 ` Chen Ridong
2025-12-04 12:31 ` [RFC PATCH -next 2/2] mm/mglru: remove memcg lru Chen Ridong
2025-12-04 18:34 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-12-05 2:57 ` [RFC PATCH -next 1/2] mm/mglru: use mem_cgroup_iter for global reclaim zhongjinji
2025-12-08 2:35 ` Chen Ridong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14b2584b-3ac7-4358-9d81-40ca32683e4f@huaweicloud.com \
--to=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--cc=zhongjinji@honor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox