linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v1] mm: drop NULL return check of pte_offset_map_lock()
@ 2017-05-18  6:42 Naoya Horiguchi
  2017-05-19 13:15 ` Vlastimil Babka
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Naoya Horiguchi @ 2017-05-18  6:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm
  Cc: Mel Gorman, Johannes Weiner, Andrea Arcangeli, Rik van Riel,
	Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, Naoya Horiguchi

pte_offset_map_lock() finds and takes ptl, and returns pte.
But some callers return without unlocking the ptl when pte == NULL,
which seems weird.

Git history said that !pte check in change_pte_range() was introduced in
commit 1ad9f620c3a2 ("mm: numa: recheck for transhuge pages under lock
during protection changes") and still remains after commit 175ad4f1e7a2
("mm: mprotect: use pmd_trans_unstable instead of taking the pmd_lock")
which partially reverts 1ad9f620c3a2. So I think that it's just dead code.

Many other caller of pte_offset_map_lock() never check NULL return, so
let's do likewise.

Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
---
 mm/memory.c   | 2 --
 mm/mprotect.c | 2 --
 2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50/mm/memory.c v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50_patched/mm/memory.c
index 8ae6700..c17fad1d 100644
--- v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50/mm/memory.c
+++ v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50_patched/mm/memory.c
@@ -4040,8 +4040,6 @@ static int __follow_pte_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 		goto out;
 
 	ptep = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, ptlp);
-	if (!ptep)
-		goto out;
 	if (!pte_present(*ptep))
 		goto unlock;
 	*ptepp = ptep;
diff --git v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50/mm/mprotect.c v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50_patched/mm/mprotect.c
index 8fd010f..d60a1ee 100644
--- v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50/mm/mprotect.c
+++ v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50_patched/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -58,8 +58,6 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
 	 * reading.
 	 */
 	pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
-	if (!pte)
-		return 0;
 
 	/* Get target node for single threaded private VMAs */
 	if (prot_numa && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) &&
-- 
2.7.0

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1] mm: drop NULL return check of pte_offset_map_lock()
  2017-05-18  6:42 [PATCH v1] mm: drop NULL return check of pte_offset_map_lock() Naoya Horiguchi
@ 2017-05-19 13:15 ` Vlastimil Babka
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Vlastimil Babka @ 2017-05-19 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Naoya Horiguchi, linux-mm
  Cc: Mel Gorman, Johannes Weiner, Andrea Arcangeli, Rik van Riel,
	Andrew Morton, linux-kernel

On 05/18/2017 08:42 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> pte_offset_map_lock() finds and takes ptl, and returns pte.
> But some callers return without unlocking the ptl when pte == NULL,
> which seems weird.
> 
> Git history said that !pte check in change_pte_range() was introduced in
> commit 1ad9f620c3a2 ("mm: numa: recheck for transhuge pages under lock
> during protection changes") and still remains after commit 175ad4f1e7a2
> ("mm: mprotect: use pmd_trans_unstable instead of taking the pmd_lock")
> which partially reverts 1ad9f620c3a2. So I think that it's just dead code.
> 
> Many other caller of pte_offset_map_lock() never check NULL return, so
> let's do likewise.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

> ---
>  mm/memory.c   | 2 --
>  mm/mprotect.c | 2 --
>  2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50/mm/memory.c v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50_patched/mm/memory.c
> index 8ae6700..c17fad1d 100644
> --- v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50/mm/memory.c
> +++ v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50_patched/mm/memory.c
> @@ -4040,8 +4040,6 @@ static int __follow_pte_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>  		goto out;
>  
>  	ptep = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, ptlp);
> -	if (!ptep)
> -		goto out;
>  	if (!pte_present(*ptep))
>  		goto unlock;
>  	*ptepp = ptep;
> diff --git v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50/mm/mprotect.c v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50_patched/mm/mprotect.c
> index 8fd010f..d60a1ee 100644
> --- v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50/mm/mprotect.c
> +++ v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50_patched/mm/mprotect.c
> @@ -58,8 +58,6 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>  	 * reading.
>  	 */
>  	pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
> -	if (!pte)
> -		return 0;
>  
>  	/* Get target node for single threaded private VMAs */
>  	if (prot_numa && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) &&
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-19 13:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-18  6:42 [PATCH v1] mm: drop NULL return check of pte_offset_map_lock() Naoya Horiguchi
2017-05-19 13:15 ` Vlastimil Babka

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox