From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1] mm: drop NULL return check of pte_offset_map_lock()
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 15:42:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1495089737-1292-1-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> (raw)
pte_offset_map_lock() finds and takes ptl, and returns pte.
But some callers return without unlocking the ptl when pte == NULL,
which seems weird.
Git history said that !pte check in change_pte_range() was introduced in
commit 1ad9f620c3a2 ("mm: numa: recheck for transhuge pages under lock
during protection changes") and still remains after commit 175ad4f1e7a2
("mm: mprotect: use pmd_trans_unstable instead of taking the pmd_lock")
which partially reverts 1ad9f620c3a2. So I think that it's just dead code.
Many other caller of pte_offset_map_lock() never check NULL return, so
let's do likewise.
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
---
mm/memory.c | 2 --
mm/mprotect.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50/mm/memory.c v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50_patched/mm/memory.c
index 8ae6700..c17fad1d 100644
--- v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50/mm/memory.c
+++ v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50_patched/mm/memory.c
@@ -4040,8 +4040,6 @@ static int __follow_pte_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
goto out;
ptep = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, ptlp);
- if (!ptep)
- goto out;
if (!pte_present(*ptep))
goto unlock;
*ptepp = ptep;
diff --git v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50/mm/mprotect.c v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50_patched/mm/mprotect.c
index 8fd010f..d60a1ee 100644
--- v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50/mm/mprotect.c
+++ v4.11-rc6-mmotm-2017-04-13-14-50_patched/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -58,8 +58,6 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
* reading.
*/
pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
- if (!pte)
- return 0;
/* Get target node for single threaded private VMAs */
if (prot_numa && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) &&
--
2.7.0
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2017-05-18 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-18 6:42 Naoya Horiguchi [this message]
2017-05-19 13:15 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1495089737-1292-1-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--to=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox