linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: High-order per-cpu page allocator v7
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 12:10:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1481141424.4930.71.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161207194801.krhonj7yggbedpba@techsingularity.net>

On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 19:48 +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
>  
> 
> Interesting because it didn't match what I previous measured but then
> again, when I established that netperf on localhost was slab intensive,
> it was also an older kernel. Can you tell me if SLAB or SLUB was enabled
> in your test kernel?
> 
> Either that or the baseline I used has since been changed from what you
> are testing and we're not hitting the same paths.


lpaa6:~# uname -a
Linux lpaa6 4.9.0-smp-DEV #429 SMP @1481125332 x86_64 GNU/Linux

lpaa6:~# perf record -g ./netperf -t UDP_STREAM -l 3 -- -m 16384
MIGRATED UDP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to
localhost () port 0 AF_INET
Socket  Message  Elapsed      Messages                
Size    Size     Time         Okay Errors   Throughput
bytes   bytes    secs            #      #   10^6bits/sec

212992   16384   3.00       654644      0    28601.04
212992           3.00       654592           28598.77

[ perf record: Woken up 5 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 1.888 MB perf.data (~82481 samples) ]


perf report --stdio
...
     1.92%  netperf  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k]
cache_alloc_refill                 
            |
            --- cache_alloc_refill
               |          
               |--82.22%-- kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace
               |          __kmalloc_node_track_caller
               |          __alloc_skb
               |          alloc_skb_with_frags
               |          sock_alloc_send_pskb
               |          sock_alloc_send_skb
               |          __ip_append_data.isra.50
               |          ip_make_skb
               |          udp_sendmsg
               |          inet_sendmsg
               |          sock_sendmsg
               |          SYSC_sendto
               |          sys_sendto
               |          entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
               |          __sendto_nocancel
               |          |          
               |           --100.00%-- 0x0
               |          
           

Oh wait, sock_alloc_send_skb() requests for all the bytes in skb->head :

struct sk_buff *sock_alloc_send_skb(struct sock *sk, unsigned long size,
                                    int noblock, int *errcode)
{
        return sock_alloc_send_pskb(sk, size, 0, noblock, errcode, 0);
}


Maybe one day we will avoid doing order-4 (or even order-5 in extreme
cases !) allocations for loopback as we did for af_unix :P

I mean, maybe some applications are sending 64KB UDP messages over
loopback right now...


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-07 20:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-07 10:12 Mel Gorman
2016-12-07 14:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-12-07 15:57   ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-07 16:40     ` Christoph Lameter
2016-12-07 16:45       ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-07 17:11         ` Christoph Lameter
2016-12-07 17:35           ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-07 19:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-07 19:11   ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-07 19:48   ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-07 20:10     ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2016-12-07 21:19       ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-07 23:25         ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-08  8:22           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-12-08  9:18             ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-08 10:43               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-12-08 11:06                 ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-08 14:48                   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-12-08 15:11                     ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-08 17:19                       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-12-08 17:39                         ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-08 16:04               ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1481141424.4930.71.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox