From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f198.google.com (mail-io0-f198.google.com [209.85.223.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B737F6B0069 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 14:36:07 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-io0-f198.google.com with SMTP id m203so135314784iom.6 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:36:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0094.hostedemail.com. [216.40.44.94]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w200si12356655ita.30.2016.11.25.11.36.07 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:36:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1480102557.19726.33.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] stacktrace: fix print_stack_trace printing timestamp twice From: Joe Perches Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:35:57 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <9df5bd889e1b980d84aa41e7010e622005fd0665.1478632698.git.andreyknvl@google.com> <2a6c133d-a42e-34ca-108c-b1399b939d65@virtuozzo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dmitry Vyukov , Andrey Ryabinin Cc: Andrey Konovalov , Alexander Potapenko , kasan-dev , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Kostya Serebryany , Peter Zijlstra On Fri, 2016-11-25 at 18:40 +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > But should we add KERN_CONT to print_ip_sym instead of duplicating it > everywhere? Or add print_ip_sym_cont? There are only a couple dozen uses of print_ip_sym. It might be better to use "[<%p>] %pS" directly everywhere and remove print_ip_sym instead to avoid the KERN_CONT and avoid all possible interleaved output. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org