From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: joelaf@google.com, jszhang@marvell.com, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
joaodias@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] mm: refactor __purge_vmap_area_lazy
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:56:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476773771-11470-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476773771-11470-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>
Move the purge_lock synchronization to the callers, move the call to
purge_fragmented_blocks_allcpus at the beginning of the function to
the callers that need it, move the force_flush behavior to the caller
that needs it, and pass start and end by value instead of by reference.
No change in behavior.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index f2481cb..d045a10 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -601,6 +601,13 @@ static unsigned long lazy_max_pages(void)
static atomic_t vmap_lazy_nr = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
+/*
+ * Serialize vmap purging. There is no actual criticial section protected
+ * by this look, but we want to avoid concurrent calls for performance
+ * reasons and to make the pcpu_get_vm_areas more deterministic.
+ */
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(vmap_purge_lock);
+
/* for per-CPU blocks */
static void purge_fragmented_blocks_allcpus(void);
@@ -615,59 +622,36 @@ void set_iounmap_nonlazy(void)
/*
* Purges all lazily-freed vmap areas.
- *
- * If sync is 0 then don't purge if there is already a purge in progress.
- * If force_flush is 1, then flush kernel TLBs between *start and *end even
- * if we found no lazy vmap areas to unmap (callers can use this to optimise
- * their own TLB flushing).
- * Returns with *start = min(*start, lowest purged address)
- * *end = max(*end, highest purged address)
*/
-static void __purge_vmap_area_lazy(unsigned long *start, unsigned long *end,
- int sync, int force_flush)
+static bool __purge_vmap_area_lazy(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
- static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(purge_lock);
struct llist_node *valist;
struct vmap_area *va;
struct vmap_area *n_va;
int nr = 0;
- /*
- * If sync is 0 but force_flush is 1, we'll go sync anyway but callers
- * should not expect such behaviour. This just simplifies locking for
- * the case that isn't actually used at the moment anyway.
- */
- if (!sync && !force_flush) {
- if (!spin_trylock(&purge_lock))
- return;
- } else
- spin_lock(&purge_lock);
-
- if (sync)
- purge_fragmented_blocks_allcpus();
+ lockdep_assert_held(&vmap_purge_lock);
valist = llist_del_all(&vmap_purge_list);
llist_for_each_entry(va, valist, purge_list) {
- if (va->va_start < *start)
- *start = va->va_start;
- if (va->va_end > *end)
- *end = va->va_end;
+ if (va->va_start < start)
+ start = va->va_start;
+ if (va->va_end > end)
+ end = va->va_end;
nr += (va->va_end - va->va_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
}
- if (nr)
- atomic_sub(nr, &vmap_lazy_nr);
+ if (!nr)
+ return false;
- if (nr || force_flush)
- flush_tlb_kernel_range(*start, *end);
+ atomic_sub(nr, &vmap_lazy_nr);
+ flush_tlb_kernel_range(start, end);
- if (nr) {
- spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock);
- llist_for_each_entry_safe(va, n_va, valist, purge_list)
- __free_vmap_area(va);
- spin_unlock(&vmap_area_lock);
- }
- spin_unlock(&purge_lock);
+ spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock);
+ llist_for_each_entry_safe(va, n_va, valist, purge_list)
+ __free_vmap_area(va);
+ spin_unlock(&vmap_area_lock);
+ return true;
}
/*
@@ -676,9 +660,10 @@ static void __purge_vmap_area_lazy(unsigned long *start, unsigned long *end,
*/
static void try_purge_vmap_area_lazy(void)
{
- unsigned long start = ULONG_MAX, end = 0;
-
- __purge_vmap_area_lazy(&start, &end, 0, 0);
+ if (spin_trylock(&vmap_purge_lock)) {
+ __purge_vmap_area_lazy(ULONG_MAX, 0);
+ spin_unlock(&vmap_purge_lock);
+ }
}
/*
@@ -686,9 +671,10 @@ static void try_purge_vmap_area_lazy(void)
*/
static void purge_vmap_area_lazy(void)
{
- unsigned long start = ULONG_MAX, end = 0;
-
- __purge_vmap_area_lazy(&start, &end, 1, 0);
+ spin_lock(&vmap_purge_lock);
+ purge_fragmented_blocks_allcpus();
+ __purge_vmap_area_lazy(ULONG_MAX, 0);
+ spin_unlock(&vmap_purge_lock);
}
/*
@@ -1094,7 +1080,11 @@ void vm_unmap_aliases(void)
rcu_read_unlock();
}
- __purge_vmap_area_lazy(&start, &end, 1, flush);
+ spin_lock(&vmap_purge_lock);
+ purge_fragmented_blocks_allcpus();
+ if (!__purge_vmap_area_lazy(start, end) && flush)
+ flush_tlb_kernel_range(start, end);
+ spin_unlock(&vmap_purge_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vm_unmap_aliases);
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-18 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-18 6:56 [RFC] reduce latency in __purge_vmap_area_lazy Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-18 6:56 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2016-10-18 6:56 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm: mark all calls into the vmalloc subsystem as potentially sleeping Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-18 10:33 ` Chris Wilson
2016-10-18 10:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-19 11:15 ` Chris Wilson
2016-10-19 13:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-19 15:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-10-19 16:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-19 19:43 ` Chris Wilson
2016-10-21 0:32 ` Joel Fernandes
2016-11-08 13:24 ` Joel Fernandes
2016-11-08 14:32 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-10-18 6:56 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm: remove free_unmap_vmap_area_noflush Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-18 6:56 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm: remove free_unmap_vmap_area_addr Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-21 0:46 ` Joel Fernandes
2016-10-21 1:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-10-18 6:56 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm: turn vmap_purge_lock into a mutex Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-18 6:56 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm: add preempt points into __purge_vmap_area_lazy Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-18 20:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-10-18 21:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-10-18 10:40 ` [RFC] reduce latency in __purge_vmap_area_lazy Nicholas Piggin
2016-10-18 11:21 ` Jisheng Zhang
2016-10-21 1:08 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1476773771-11470-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=joaodias@google.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=jszhang@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox