From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] proc: task_mmu: Reduce output processing cpu time
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 01:00:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1471852859.3746.42.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160822072414.GB13596@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 09:24 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sat 20-08-16 01:00:17, Joe Perches wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > static int proc_maps_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
> > const struct seq_operations *ops, int psize)
> > {
> > - struct proc_maps_private *priv = __seq_open_private(file, ops, psize);
> > + struct proc_maps_private *priv;
> > + struct mm_struct *mm;
> > +
> > + mm = proc_mem_open(inode, PTRACE_MODE_READ);
> > + if (IS_ERR(mm))
> > + return PTR_ERR(mm);
> >
> > + priv = __seq_open_private_bufsize(file, ops, psize,
> > + mm && mm->map_count ?
> > + mm->map_count * 0x300 : PAGE_SIZE);
> NAK to this!
>
> Seriously, this just gives any random user access to user
> defined amount of memory which not accounted, not reclaimable and a
> potential consumer of any higher order blocks.
I completely disagree here with your rationale here.
I think you didn't read the code and didn't try it either.
This code is identical to the previous code but it
simply estimates the required output size first.
> Besides that, at least one show_smap output will always fit inside the
> single page and AFAIR (it's been quite a while since I've looked into
> seq_file internals) the buffer grows only when the single show doesn't
> fit in.
It's never been like that as far as I know.
Please read fs/seq_file.c:traverse()
This code starts with a PAGE_SIZE block of memory then if
the complete output doesn't fit, stops, frees that block
of memory, and retries the complete output with a last block
size allocated << 1 and tries again.
> I really do not understand why you insist on code duplication rather
> than reuse but if you really insist then just make this (without the
> above __seq_open_private_bufsize, re-measure and add the results to the
> changelog and repost.
I've tried it, I wish you would.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-22 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-18 11:31 [PATCH] proc, smaps: reduce printing overhead Michal Hocko
2016-08-18 13:26 ` Joe Perches
2016-08-18 14:26 ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-18 14:41 ` Joe Perches
2016-08-18 14:41 ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-18 14:46 ` Joe Perches
2016-08-18 14:58 ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-18 15:23 ` Joe Perches
2016-08-18 16:42 ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-19 10:12 ` [PATCH 0/2] fs, proc: optimize smaps output formatting Michal Hocko
2016-08-19 10:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] proc, meminfo: abstract show_val_kb Michal Hocko
2016-08-26 2:54 ` [lkp] [proc, meminfo] dd3b422c11: stderr.Signal#(FPE)caught_by_ps(procps-ng_version#) kernel test robot
2016-08-19 10:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] proc, smaps: reduce printing overhead Michal Hocko
2016-08-19 17:43 ` [PATCH 0/2] fs, proc: optimize smaps output formatting Joe Perches
2016-08-19 20:18 ` Joe Perches
2016-08-20 7:29 ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-20 7:55 ` Joe Perches
2016-08-20 8:00 ` [PATCH 0/2] seq: Speed up /proc/<pid>/smaps Joe Perches
2016-08-20 8:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] seq_file: Add __seq_open_private_bufsize for seq file_operation sizes Joe Perches
2016-08-20 8:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] proc: task_mmu: Reduce output processing cpu time Joe Perches
2016-08-22 7:24 ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-22 8:00 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2016-08-22 8:30 ` Joe Perches
2016-08-22 12:09 ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-23 15:14 ` [PATCH] proc, smaps: reduce printing overhead Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1471852859.3746.42.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jann@thejh.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox