From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/10] proc, oom_adj: extract oom_score_adj setting into a helper
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:16:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1464945404-30157-4-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464945404-30157-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org>
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Currently we have two proc interfaces to set oom_score_adj. The legacy
/proc/<pid>/oom_adj and /proc/<pid>/oom_score_adj which both have their
specific handlers. Big part of the logic is duplicated so extract the
common code into __set_oom_adj helper. Legacy knob still expects some
details slightly different so make sure those are handled same way - e.g.
the legacy mode ignores oom_score_adj_min and it warns about the usage.
This patch shouldn't introduce any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
fs/proc/base.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 968d5ea06e62..520fa467cad0 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -1037,7 +1037,50 @@ static ssize_t oom_adj_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count,
return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, buffer, len);
}
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(oom_adj_mutex);
+static int __set_oom_adj(struct file *file, int oom_adj, bool legacy)
+{
+ static DEFINE_MUTEX(oom_adj_mutex);
+ struct task_struct *task;
+ int err = 0;
+
+ task = get_proc_task(file_inode(file));
+ if (!task) {
+ err = -ESRCH;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ mutex_lock(&oom_adj_mutex);
+ if (legacy) {
+ if (oom_adj < task->signal->oom_score_adj &&
+ !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) {
+ err = -EACCES;
+ goto err_unlock;
+ }
+ /*
+ * /proc/pid/oom_adj is provided for legacy purposes, ask users to use
+ * /proc/pid/oom_score_adj instead.
+ */
+ pr_warn_once("%s (%d): /proc/%d/oom_adj is deprecated, please use /proc/%d/oom_score_adj instead.\n",
+ current->comm, task_pid_nr(current), task_pid_nr(task),
+ task_pid_nr(task));
+ } else {
+ if ((short)oom_adj < task->signal->oom_score_adj_min &&
+ !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) {
+ err = -EACCES;
+ goto err_unlock;
+ }
+ }
+
+ task->signal->oom_score_adj = oom_adj;
+ if (!legacy && has_capability_noaudit(current, CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
+ task->signal->oom_score_adj_min = (short)oom_adj;
+ trace_oom_score_adj_update(task);
+err_unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&oom_adj_mutex);
+ put_task_struct(task);
+out:
+ return err;
+}
/*
* /proc/pid/oom_adj exists solely for backwards compatibility with previous
@@ -1052,7 +1095,6 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(oom_adj_mutex);
static ssize_t oom_adj_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
- struct task_struct *task;
char buffer[PROC_NUMBUF];
int oom_adj;
int err;
@@ -1074,12 +1116,6 @@ static ssize_t oom_adj_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
goto out;
}
- task = get_proc_task(file_inode(file));
- if (!task) {
- err = -ESRCH;
- goto out;
- }
-
/*
* Scale /proc/pid/oom_score_adj appropriately ensuring that a maximum
* value is always attainable.
@@ -1089,26 +1125,7 @@ static ssize_t oom_adj_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
else
oom_adj = (oom_adj * OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX) / -OOM_DISABLE;
- mutex_lock(&oom_adj_mutex);
- if (oom_adj < task->signal->oom_score_adj &&
- !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) {
- err = -EACCES;
- goto err_unlock;
- }
-
- /*
- * /proc/pid/oom_adj is provided for legacy purposes, ask users to use
- * /proc/pid/oom_score_adj instead.
- */
- pr_warn_once("%s (%d): /proc/%d/oom_adj is deprecated, please use /proc/%d/oom_score_adj instead.\n",
- current->comm, task_pid_nr(current), task_pid_nr(task),
- task_pid_nr(task));
-
- task->signal->oom_score_adj = oom_adj;
- trace_oom_score_adj_update(task);
-err_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&oom_adj_mutex);
- put_task_struct(task);
+ err = __set_oom_adj(file, oom_adj, true);
out:
return err < 0 ? err : count;
}
@@ -1138,7 +1155,6 @@ static ssize_t oom_score_adj_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
static ssize_t oom_score_adj_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
- struct task_struct *task;
char buffer[PROC_NUMBUF];
int oom_score_adj;
int err;
@@ -1160,28 +1176,7 @@ static ssize_t oom_score_adj_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
goto out;
}
- task = get_proc_task(file_inode(file));
- if (!task) {
- err = -ESRCH;
- goto out;
- }
-
- mutex_lock(&oom_adj_mutex);
- if ((short)oom_score_adj < task->signal->oom_score_adj_min &&
- !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) {
- err = -EACCES;
- goto err_unlock;
- }
-
- task->signal->oom_score_adj = (short)oom_score_adj;
- if (has_capability_noaudit(current, CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
- task->signal->oom_score_adj_min = (short)oom_score_adj;
-
- trace_oom_score_adj_update(task);
-
-err_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&oom_adj_mutex);
- put_task_struct(task);
+ err = __set_oom_adj(file, oom_score_adj, false);
out:
return err < 0 ? err : count;
}
--
2.8.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-03 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-03 9:16 [PATCH 0/10 -v3] Handle oom bypass more gracefully Michal Hocko
2016-06-03 9:16 ` [PATCH 01/10] proc, oom: drop bogus task_lock and mm check Michal Hocko
2016-06-03 9:16 ` [PATCH 02/10] proc, oom: drop bogus sighand lock Michal Hocko
2016-06-03 9:16 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-06-03 9:16 ` [PATCH 04/10] mm, oom_adj: make sure processes sharing mm have same view of oom_score_adj Michal Hocko
2016-06-03 9:16 ` [PATCH 05/10] mm, oom: skip vforked tasks from being selected Michal Hocko
2016-06-03 9:16 ` [PATCH 06/10] mm, oom: kill all tasks sharing the mm Michal Hocko
2016-06-06 22:27 ` David Rientjes
2016-06-06 23:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-07 6:37 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-07 22:15 ` David Rientjes
2016-06-08 6:22 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-08 22:51 ` David Rientjes
2016-06-09 6:46 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-03 9:16 ` [PATCH 07/10] mm, oom: fortify task_will_free_mem Michal Hocko
2016-06-03 11:42 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-06-03 12:12 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-03 9:16 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm, oom: task_will_free_mem should skip oom_reaped tasks Michal Hocko
2016-06-03 9:16 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] mm, oom_reaper: do not attempt to reap a task more than twice Michal Hocko
2016-06-03 9:16 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] mm, oom: hide mm which is shared with kthread or global init Michal Hocko
2016-06-03 15:16 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-06-06 8:15 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-06 13:26 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-07 6:26 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-03 12:00 ` [PATCH 0/10 -v3] Handle oom bypass more gracefully Tetsuo Handa
2016-06-03 12:20 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-03 12:22 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-04 10:57 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-06-06 8:39 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-03 15:17 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-06-06 8:36 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-07 14:30 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-06-07 15:05 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-07 21:49 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-06-08 7:27 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-08 14:55 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-06-08 16:05 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-09 11:52 [PATCH 0/10 -v4] " Michal Hocko
2016-06-09 11:52 ` [PATCH 03/10] proc, oom_adj: extract oom_score_adj setting into a helper Michal Hocko
2016-06-20 12:43 [PATCH 0/10 -v5] Handle oom bypass more gracefully Michal Hocko
2016-06-20 12:43 ` [PATCH 03/10] proc, oom_adj: extract oom_score_adj setting into a helper Michal Hocko
[not found] <06be01d1cb9c$8f235850$ad6a08f0$@alibaba-inc.com>
2016-06-21 9:27 ` Hillf Danton
2016-06-21 11:17 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-22 3:17 ` Hillf Danton
2016-06-22 6:34 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1464945404-30157-4-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox