linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: js1304@gmail.com
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/11] mm/slab: refill cpu cache through a new slab without holding a node lock
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:51:05 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1460436666-20462-11-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460436666-20462-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>

From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>

Until now, cache growing makes a free slab on node's slab list and then we
can allocate free objects from it.  This necessarily requires to hold a
node lock which is very contended.  If we refill cpu cache before
attaching it to node's slab list, we can avoid holding a node lock as much
as possible because this newly allocated slab is only visible to the
current task.  This will reduce lock contention.

Below is the result of concurrent allocation/free in slab allocation
benchmark made by Christoph a long time ago.  I make the output simpler.
The number shows cycle count during alloc/free respectively so less is
better.

* Before
Kmalloc N*alloc N*free(32): Average=355/750
Kmalloc N*alloc N*free(64): Average=452/812
Kmalloc N*alloc N*free(128): Average=559/1070
Kmalloc N*alloc N*free(256): Average=1176/980
Kmalloc N*alloc N*free(512): Average=1939/1189
Kmalloc N*alloc N*free(1024): Average=3521/1278
Kmalloc N*alloc N*free(2048): Average=7152/1838
Kmalloc N*alloc N*free(4096): Average=13438/2013

* After
Kmalloc N*alloc N*free(32): Average=248/966
Kmalloc N*alloc N*free(64): Average=261/949
Kmalloc N*alloc N*free(128): Average=314/1016
Kmalloc N*alloc N*free(256): Average=741/1061
Kmalloc N*alloc N*free(512): Average=1246/1152
Kmalloc N*alloc N*free(1024): Average=2437/1259
Kmalloc N*alloc N*free(2048): Average=4980/1800
Kmalloc N*alloc N*free(4096): Average=9000/2078

It shows that contention is reduced for all the object sizes and
performance increases by 30 ~ 40%.

Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
---
 mm/slab.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index 2c28ad5..cf12fbd 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -2852,6 +2852,30 @@ static noinline void *cache_alloc_pfmemalloc(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
 	return obj;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Slab list should be fixed up by fixup_slab_list() for existing slab
+ * or cache_grow_end() for new slab
+ */
+static __always_inline int alloc_block(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
+		struct array_cache *ac, struct page *page, int batchcount)
+{
+	/*
+	 * There must be at least one object available for
+	 * allocation.
+	 */
+	BUG_ON(page->active >= cachep->num);
+
+	while (page->active < cachep->num && batchcount--) {
+		STATS_INC_ALLOCED(cachep);
+		STATS_INC_ACTIVE(cachep);
+		STATS_SET_HIGH(cachep);
+
+		ac->entry[ac->avail++] = slab_get_obj(cachep, page);
+	}
+
+	return batchcount;
+}
+
 static void *cache_alloc_refill(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t flags)
 {
 	int batchcount;
@@ -2864,7 +2888,6 @@ static void *cache_alloc_refill(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t flags)
 	check_irq_off();
 	node = numa_mem_id();
 
-retry:
 	ac = cpu_cache_get(cachep);
 	batchcount = ac->batchcount;
 	if (!ac->touched && batchcount > BATCHREFILL_LIMIT) {
@@ -2894,21 +2917,7 @@ retry:
 
 		check_spinlock_acquired(cachep);
 
-		/*
-		 * The slab was either on partial or free list so
-		 * there must be at least one object available for
-		 * allocation.
-		 */
-		BUG_ON(page->active >= cachep->num);
-
-		while (page->active < cachep->num && batchcount--) {
-			STATS_INC_ALLOCED(cachep);
-			STATS_INC_ACTIVE(cachep);
-			STATS_SET_HIGH(cachep);
-
-			ac->entry[ac->avail++] = slab_get_obj(cachep, page);
-		}
-
+		batchcount = alloc_block(cachep, ac, page, batchcount);
 		fixup_slab_list(cachep, n, page, &list);
 	}
 
@@ -2928,21 +2937,18 @@ alloc_done:
 		}
 
 		page = cache_grow_begin(cachep, gfp_exact_node(flags), node);
-		cache_grow_end(cachep, page);
 
 		/*
 		 * cache_grow_begin() can reenable interrupts,
 		 * then ac could change.
 		 */
 		ac = cpu_cache_get(cachep);
-		node = numa_mem_id();
+		if (!ac->avail && page)
+			alloc_block(cachep, ac, page, batchcount);
+		cache_grow_end(cachep, page);
 
-		/* no objects in sight? abort */
-		if (!page && ac->avail == 0)
+		if (!ac->avail)
 			return NULL;
-
-		if (!ac->avail)		/* objects refilled by interrupt? */
-			goto retry;
 	}
 	ac->touched = 1;
 
@@ -3136,14 +3142,13 @@ static void *____cache_alloc_node(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t flags,
 {
 	struct page *page;
 	struct kmem_cache_node *n;
-	void *obj;
+	void *obj = NULL;
 	void *list = NULL;
 
 	VM_BUG_ON(nodeid < 0 || nodeid >= MAX_NUMNODES);
 	n = get_node(cachep, nodeid);
 	BUG_ON(!n);
 
-retry:
 	check_irq_off();
 	spin_lock(&n->list_lock);
 	page = get_first_slab(n, false);
@@ -3165,19 +3170,18 @@ retry:
 
 	spin_unlock(&n->list_lock);
 	fixup_objfreelist_debug(cachep, &list);
-	goto done;
+	return obj;
 
 must_grow:
 	spin_unlock(&n->list_lock);
 	page = cache_grow_begin(cachep, gfp_exact_node(flags), nodeid);
+	if (page) {
+		/* This slab isn't counted yet so don't update free_objects */
+		obj = slab_get_obj(cachep, page);
+	}
 	cache_grow_end(cachep, page);
-	if (page)
-		goto retry;
 
-	return fallback_alloc(cachep, flags);
-
-done:
-	return obj;
+	return obj ? obj : fallback_alloc(cachep, flags);
 }
 
 static __always_inline void *
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-12  4:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-12  4:50 [PATCH v2 00/11] mm/slab: reduce lock contention in alloc path js1304
2016-04-12  4:50 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] mm/slab: fix the theoretical race by holding proper lock js1304
2016-04-12 16:38   ` Christoph Lameter
2016-04-14  1:56     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-04-12  4:50 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] mm/slab: remove BAD_ALIEN_MAGIC again js1304
2016-04-12 16:41   ` Christoph Lameter
2016-04-12  4:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] mm/slab: drain the free slab as much as possible js1304
2016-04-12  4:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] mm/slab: factor out kmem_cache_node initialization code js1304
2016-04-12 16:53   ` Christoph Lameter
2016-04-26  0:47   ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-04-12  4:51 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] mm/slab: clean-up kmem_cache_node setup js1304
2016-04-12 16:55   ` Christoph Lameter
2016-04-12  4:51 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] mm/slab: don't keep free slabs if free_objects exceeds free_limit js1304
2016-07-22 11:51   ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-26  7:18     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-04-12  4:51 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] mm/slab: racy access/modify the slab color js1304
2016-04-12  4:51 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] mm/slab: make cache_grow() handle the page allocated on arbitrary node js1304
2016-04-12  4:51 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] mm/slab: separate cache_grow() to two parts js1304
2016-04-12  4:51 ` js1304 [this message]
2016-04-12  4:51 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] mm/slab: lockless decision to grow cache js1304
2016-04-12  7:24   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-04-12  8:16     ` Joonsoo Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1460436666-20462-11-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --to=js1304@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox