linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC v1] mm: SLAB freelist randomization
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 18:17:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1460045867.2818.67.camel@debian.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jLEENTFL_NYA5r4SqmUefkEwL68_Br6bX_RY2xNv95GVg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 576 bytes --]

On mer., 2016-04-06 at 14:45 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > This security feature reduces the predictability of
> > the kernel slab allocator against heap overflows.
> 
> I would add "... rendering attacks much less stable." And if you can
> find a specific example exploit that is foiled by this, I would refer
> to it.

One good example might (or might not) be the keyring issue from earlier this
year (CVE-2016-0728):

http://perception-point.io/2016/01/14/analysis-and-exploitation-of-a-linux-ker
nel-vulnerability-cve-2016-0728/

Regards,
-- 
Yves-Alexis


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-07 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-06 19:35 Thomas Garnier
2016-04-06 20:54 ` [kernel-hardening] " Greg KH
2016-04-06 21:03   ` Thomas Garnier
2016-04-06 21:45 ` Kees Cook
2016-04-07 15:28   ` Thomas Garnier
2016-04-07 16:17   ` Yves-Alexis Perez [this message]
2016-04-07 16:35     ` [kernel-hardening] " Thomas Garnier
2016-04-07 21:14   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-04-08  2:31     ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1460045867.2818.67.camel@debian.org \
    --to=corsac@debian.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=labbott@fedoraproject.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=thgarnie@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox