linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/14] mm: Batch-copy PTE ranges during fork()
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:20:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459f78b-e80c-4f21-bc65-f0ab259d348a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89a9fe07-a5c5-4a99-b588-e6145053c58f@redhat.com>

On 16/11/2023 11:03, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 15.11.23 17:30, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> Convert copy_pte_range() to copy a set of ptes in a batch. A given batch
>> maps a physically contiguous block of memory, all belonging to the same
>> folio, with the same permissions, and for shared mappings, the same
>> dirty state. This will likely improve performance by a tiny amount due
>> to batching the folio reference count management and calling set_ptes()
>> rather than making individual calls to set_pte_at().
>>
>> However, the primary motivation for this change is to reduce the number
>> of tlb maintenance operations that the arm64 backend has to perform
>> during fork, as it is about to add transparent support for the
>> "contiguous bit" in its ptes. By write-protecting the parent using the
>> new ptep_set_wrprotects() (note the 's' at the end) function, the
>> backend can avoid having to unfold contig ranges of PTEs, which is
>> expensive, when all ptes in the range are being write-protected.
>> Similarly, by using set_ptes() rather than set_pte_at() to set up ptes
>> in the child, the backend does not need to fold a contiguous range once
>> they are all populated - they can be initially populated as a contiguous
>> range in the first place.
>>
>> This change addresses the core-mm refactoring only, and introduces
>> ptep_set_wrprotects() with a default implementation that calls
>> ptep_set_wrprotect() for each pte in the range. A separate change will
>> implement ptep_set_wrprotects() in the arm64 backend to realize the
>> performance improvement as part of the work to enable contpte mappings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
>> ---
>>   include/linux/pgtable.h |  13 +++
>>   mm/memory.c             | 175 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>   2 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
>> index af7639c3b0a3..1c50f8a0fdde 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
>> @@ -622,6 +622,19 @@ static inline void ptep_set_wrprotect(struct mm_struct
>> *mm, unsigned long addres
>>   }
>>   #endif
>>   +#ifndef ptep_set_wrprotects
>> +struct mm_struct;
>> +static inline void ptep_set_wrprotects(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> +                unsigned long address, pte_t *ptep,
>> +                unsigned int nr)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned int i;
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < nr; i++, address += PAGE_SIZE, ptep++)
>> +        ptep_set_wrprotect(mm, address, ptep);
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>>   /*
>>    * On some architectures hardware does not set page access bit when accessing
>>    * memory page, it is responsibility of software setting this bit. It brings
>> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
>> index 1f18ed4a5497..b7c8228883cf 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory.c
>> @@ -921,46 +921,129 @@ copy_present_page(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma,
>> struct vm_area_struct *src_vma
>>           /* Uffd-wp needs to be delivered to dest pte as well */
>>           pte = pte_mkuffd_wp(pte);
>>       set_pte_at(dst_vma->vm_mm, addr, dst_pte, pte);
>> -    return 0;
>> +    return 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline unsigned long page_cont_mapped_vaddr(struct page *page,
>> +                struct page *anchor, unsigned long anchor_vaddr)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned long offset;
>> +    unsigned long vaddr;
>> +
>> +    offset = (page_to_pfn(page) - page_to_pfn(anchor)) << PAGE_SHIFT;
>> +    vaddr = anchor_vaddr + offset;
>> +
>> +    if (anchor > page) {
>> +        if (vaddr > anchor_vaddr)
>> +            return 0;
>> +    } else {
>> +        if (vaddr < anchor_vaddr)
>> +            return ULONG_MAX;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return vaddr;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int folio_nr_pages_cont_mapped(struct folio *folio,
>> +                      struct page *page, pte_t *pte,
>> +                      unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>> +                      pte_t ptent, bool *any_dirty)
>> +{
>> +    int floops;
>> +    int i;
>> +    unsigned long pfn;
>> +    pgprot_t prot;
>> +    struct page *folio_end;
>> +
>> +    if (!folio_test_large(folio))
>> +        return 1;
>> +
>> +    folio_end = &folio->page + folio_nr_pages(folio);
>> +    end = min(page_cont_mapped_vaddr(folio_end, page, addr), end);
>> +    floops = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> +    pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>> +    prot = pte_pgprot(pte_mkold(pte_mkclean(ptent)));
>> +
>> +    *any_dirty = pte_dirty(ptent);
>> +
>> +    pfn++;
>> +    pte++;
>> +
>> +    for (i = 1; i < floops; i++) {
>> +        ptent = ptep_get(pte);
>> +        ptent = pte_mkold(pte_mkclean(ptent));
>> +
>> +        if (!pte_present(ptent) || pte_pfn(ptent) != pfn ||
>> +            pgprot_val(pte_pgprot(ptent)) != pgprot_val(prot))
>> +            break;
>> +
>> +        if (pte_dirty(ptent))
>> +            *any_dirty = true;
>> +
>> +        pfn++;
>> +        pte++;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return i;
>>   }
>>     /*
>> - * Copy one pte.  Returns 0 if succeeded, or -EAGAIN if one preallocated page
>> - * is required to copy this pte.
>> + * Copy set of contiguous ptes.  Returns number of ptes copied if succeeded
>> + * (always gte 1), or -EAGAIN if one preallocated page is required to copy the
>> + * first pte.
>>    */
>>   static inline int
>> -copy_present_pte(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma,
>> -         pte_t *dst_pte, pte_t *src_pte, unsigned long addr, int *rss,
>> -         struct folio **prealloc)
>> +copy_present_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct
>> *src_vma,
>> +          pte_t *dst_pte, pte_t *src_pte,
>> +          unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>> +          int *rss, struct folio **prealloc)
>>   {
>>       struct mm_struct *src_mm = src_vma->vm_mm;
>>       unsigned long vm_flags = src_vma->vm_flags;
>>       pte_t pte = ptep_get(src_pte);
>>       struct page *page;
>>       struct folio *folio;
>> +    int nr = 1;
>> +    bool anon;
>> +    bool any_dirty = pte_dirty(pte);
>> +    int i;
>>         page = vm_normal_page(src_vma, addr, pte);
>> -    if (page)
>> +    if (page) {
>>           folio = page_folio(page);
>> -    if (page && folio_test_anon(folio)) {
>> -        /*
>> -         * If this page may have been pinned by the parent process,
>> -         * copy the page immediately for the child so that we'll always
>> -         * guarantee the pinned page won't be randomly replaced in the
>> -         * future.
>> -         */
>> -        folio_get(folio);
>> -        if (unlikely(page_try_dup_anon_rmap(page, false, src_vma))) {
>> -            /* Page may be pinned, we have to copy. */
>> -            folio_put(folio);
>> -            return copy_present_page(dst_vma, src_vma, dst_pte, src_pte,
>> -                         addr, rss, prealloc, page);
>> +        anon = folio_test_anon(folio);
>> +        nr = folio_nr_pages_cont_mapped(folio, page, src_pte, addr,
>> +                        end, pte, &any_dirty);
>> +
>> +        for (i = 0; i < nr; i++, page++) {
>> +            if (anon) {
>> +                /*
>> +                 * If this page may have been pinned by the
>> +                 * parent process, copy the page immediately for
>> +                 * the child so that we'll always guarantee the
>> +                 * pinned page won't be randomly replaced in the
>> +                 * future.
>> +                 */
>> +                if (unlikely(page_try_dup_anon_rmap(
>> +                        page, false, src_vma))) {
>> +                    if (i != 0)
>> +                        break;
>> +                    /* Page may be pinned, we have to copy. */
>> +                    return copy_present_page(
>> +                        dst_vma, src_vma, dst_pte,
>> +                        src_pte, addr, rss, prealloc,
>> +                        page);
>> +                }
>> +                rss[MM_ANONPAGES]++;
>> +                VM_BUG_ON(PageAnonExclusive(page));
>> +            } else {
>> +                page_dup_file_rmap(page, false);
>> +                rss[mm_counter_file(page)]++;
>> +            }
>>           }
>> -        rss[MM_ANONPAGES]++;
>> -    } else if (page) {
>> -        folio_get(folio);
>> -        page_dup_file_rmap(page, false);
>> -        rss[mm_counter_file(page)]++;
>> +
>> +        nr = i;
>> +        folio_ref_add(folio, nr);
>>       }
>>         /*
>> @@ -968,24 +1051,28 @@ copy_present_pte(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct
>> vm_area_struct *src_vma,
>>        * in the parent and the child
>>        */
>>       if (is_cow_mapping(vm_flags) && pte_write(pte)) {
>> -        ptep_set_wrprotect(src_mm, addr, src_pte);
>> +        ptep_set_wrprotects(src_mm, addr, src_pte, nr);
>>           pte = pte_wrprotect(pte);
> 
> You likely want an "any_pte_writable" check here instead, no?
> 
> Any operations that target a single indiividual PTE while multiple PTEs are
> adjusted are suspicious :)

The idea is that I've already constrained the batch of pages such that the
permissions are all the same (see folio_nr_pages_cont_mapped()). So if the first
pte is writable, then they all are - something has gone badly wrong if some are
writable and others are not.

The dirty bit has any_dirty special case, because we (deliberately) don't
consider access/dirty when determining the batch. Given the batch is all covered
by the same folio, and the kernel maintains the access/dirty info per-folio, we
don't want to uneccessarily reduce the batch size just because one of the pages
in the folio has been written to.

> 



  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-16 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-15 16:30 [PATCH v2 00/14] Transparent Contiguous PTEs for User Mappings Ryan Roberts
2023-11-15 16:30 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] mm: Batch-copy PTE ranges during fork() Ryan Roberts
2023-11-15 21:26   ` kernel test robot
2023-11-16 10:07     ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-16 10:12       ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-16 10:36         ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-16 11:01           ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-16 11:13             ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-15 21:37   ` Andrew Morton
2023-11-16  9:34     ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-04 11:01     ` Christophe Leroy
2023-11-15 22:40   ` kernel test robot
2023-11-16 10:03   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-16 10:26     ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-27  8:42     ` Barry Song
2023-11-27  9:35       ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-27  9:59         ` Barry Song
2023-11-27 10:10           ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-27 10:28             ` Barry Song
2023-11-27 11:07               ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-27 20:34                 ` Barry Song
2023-11-28  9:14                   ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-28  9:49                     ` Barry Song
2023-11-28 10:49                       ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-28 21:06                         ` Barry Song
2023-11-29 12:21                           ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-30  0:51                             ` Barry Song
2023-11-16 11:03   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-16 11:20     ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2023-11-16 13:20       ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-16 13:49         ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-16 14:13           ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-16 14:15             ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-16 17:58               ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-23 10:26               ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-23 12:12                 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-23 12:28                   ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-24  8:53                     ` David Hildenbrand
2023-11-23  4:26   ` Alistair Popple
2023-11-23 14:43     ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-23 23:50       ` Alistair Popple
2023-11-27  5:54   ` Barry Song
2023-11-27  9:24     ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-28  0:11       ` Barry Song
2023-11-28 11:00         ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-28 19:00           ` Barry Song
2023-11-29 12:29             ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-29 13:09               ` Barry Song
2023-11-29 14:07                 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-30  0:34                   ` Barry Song
2023-11-15 16:30 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] arm64/mm: set_pte(): New layer to manage contig bit Ryan Roberts
2023-11-15 16:30 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] arm64/mm: set_ptes()/set_pte_at(): " Ryan Roberts
2023-11-15 16:30 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] arm64/mm: pte_clear(): " Ryan Roberts
2023-11-15 16:30 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] arm64/mm: ptep_get_and_clear(): " Ryan Roberts
2023-11-15 16:30 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] arm64/mm: ptep_test_and_clear_young(): " Ryan Roberts
2023-11-15 16:30 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] arm64/mm: ptep_clear_flush_young(): " Ryan Roberts
2023-11-15 16:30 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] arm64/mm: ptep_set_wrprotect(): " Ryan Roberts
2023-11-15 16:30 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] arm64/mm: ptep_set_access_flags(): " Ryan Roberts
2023-11-15 16:30 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] arm64/mm: ptep_get(): " Ryan Roberts
2023-11-15 16:30 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] arm64/mm: Split __flush_tlb_range() to elide trailing DSB Ryan Roberts
2023-11-15 16:30 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] arm64/mm: Wire up PTE_CONT for user mappings Ryan Roberts
2023-11-21 11:22   ` Alistair Popple
2023-11-21 15:14     ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-22  6:01       ` Alistair Popple
2023-11-22  8:35         ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-15 16:30 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] arm64/mm: Implement ptep_set_wrprotects() to optimize fork() Ryan Roberts
2023-11-15 16:30 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] arm64/mm: Add ptep_get_and_clear_full() to optimize process teardown Ryan Roberts
2023-11-23  5:13   ` Alistair Popple
2023-11-23 16:01     ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-24  1:35       ` Alistair Popple
2023-11-24  8:54         ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-27  7:34           ` Alistair Popple
2023-11-27  8:53             ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-28  6:54               ` Alistair Popple
2023-11-28 12:45                 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-28 16:55                   ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-30  5:07                     ` Alistair Popple
2023-11-30  5:57                       ` Barry Song
2023-11-30 11:47                       ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-03 23:20                         ` Alistair Popple
2023-12-04  9:39                           ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-28  7:32   ` Barry Song
2023-11-28 11:15     ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-28  8:17   ` Barry Song
2023-11-28 11:49     ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-28 20:23       ` Barry Song
2023-11-29 12:43         ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-29 13:00           ` Barry Song
2023-11-30  5:35           ` Barry Song
2023-11-30 12:00             ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-03 21:41               ` Barry Song
2023-11-27  3:18 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] Transparent Contiguous PTEs for User Mappings Barry Song
2023-11-27  9:15   ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-27 10:35     ` Barry Song
2023-11-27 11:11       ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-27 22:53         ` Barry Song
2023-11-28 11:52           ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-28  3:13     ` Yang Shi
2023-11-28 11:58       ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-28  5:49     ` Barry Song
2023-11-28 12:08       ` Ryan Roberts
2023-11-28 19:37         ` Barry Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1459f78b-e80c-4f21-bc65-f0ab259d348a@arm.com \
    --to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox