From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Shaik Ameer Basha <shaik.samsung@gmail.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Ajay kumar <ajaynumb@gmail.com>,
Linux IOMMU <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
jean-philippe@linaro.org, will@kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
baolu.lu@linux.intel.com,
Shaik Ameer Basha <shaik.ameer@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: IOVA allocation dependency between firmware buffer and remaining buffers
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:41:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1451f2dc-b64f-e7df-f0fa-f4107e18ee35@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200924101640.GE2483160@ulmo>
Hi Thierry,
On 24.09.2020 12:16, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:46:46AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> On 24.09.2020 10:28, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 08:48:26AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>>> It allows to remap given buffer at the specific IOVA address, although
>>>> it doesn't guarantee that those specific addresses won't be later used
>>>> by the IOVA allocator. Probably it would make sense to add an API for
>>>> generic IOMMU-DMA framework to mark the given IOVA range as
>>>> reserved/unused to protect them.
>>> There is an API for that, the IOMMU driver can return IOVA reserved
>>> regions per device and the IOMMU core code will take care of mapping
>>> these regions and reserving them in the IOVA allocator, so that
>>> DMA-IOMMU code will not use it for allocations.
>>>
>>> Have a look at the iommu_ops->get_resv_regions() and
>>> iommu_ops->put_resv_regions().
>> I know about the reserved regions IOMMU API, but the main problem here,
>> in case of Exynos, is that those reserved regions won't be created by
>> the IOMMU driver but by the IOMMU client device. It is just a result how
>> the media drivers manages their IOVA space. They simply have to load
>> firmware at the IOVA address lower than the any address of the used
>> buffers.
> I've been working on adding a way to automatically add direct mappings
> using reserved-memory regions parsed from device tree, see:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200904130000.691933-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/
>
> Perhaps this can be of use? With that you should be able to add a
> reserved-memory region somewhere in the lower range that you need for
> firmware images and have that automatically added as a direct mapping
> so that it won't be reused later on for dynamic allocations.
Frankly, using that would be even bigger hack than what I've proposed in
my workaround. I see no point polluting DT with such artificial regions
just to ensure specific IOVA space layout.
I just looking for a nice way of reusing most of the IOMMU DMA-mapping
code with a small addition of manual IOVA space management (just to
remap the firmware buffer at the specific IOVA address).
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-24 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-20 15:54 Ajay kumar
2020-04-24 15:04 ` Ajay kumar
2020-04-24 15:29 ` Robin Murphy
2020-04-24 16:15 ` Shaik Ameer Basha
2020-09-23 6:48 ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-09-23 6:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-23 7:45 ` Ajay kumar
2020-09-23 13:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-23 8:25 ` Ajay Kumar
2020-09-24 8:28 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-09-24 8:46 ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-09-24 10:16 ` Thierry Reding
2020-09-24 10:40 ` Robin Murphy
2020-09-24 10:47 ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-09-24 11:06 ` Robin Murphy
2020-09-24 14:14 ` Shaik Ameer Basha
2020-09-28 6:52 ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-09-24 10:41 ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]
2020-09-24 14:33 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1451f2dc-b64f-e7df-f0fa-f4107e18ee35@samsung.com \
--to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=ajaynumb@gmail.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shaik.ameer@samsung.com \
--cc=shaik.samsung@gmail.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox