From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
mcgrof@do-not-panic.com,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] arch: unify ioremap prototypes and macro aliases
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 17:10:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1436310658.3214.85.camel@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150707160703.GR7021@wotan.suse.de>
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 18:07 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 11:13:30AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
:
> > On ARM, we (probably) have a lot of cases where ioremap() is used
> > multiple
> > times for the same physical address space, so we shouldn't rule out
> > having
> > multiple mappings of the same type.
>
> Why is that done? Don't worry if you are not sure why but only
> speculate of the
> practice's existence (sloppy drivers or lazy driver developers). FWIW
> for x86
> IIRC I ended up concluding that overlapping ioremap() calls with the
> same type
> would work but not if they differ in type. Although I haven't
> written a
> grammer rule to hunt down overlapping ioremap() I suspected its use
> was likely
> odd and likely should be reconsidered. Would this be true for ARM too
> ? Or are
> you saying this should be a feature ? I don't expect an answer now
> but I'm
> saying we *should* all together decide on this, and if you're
> inclined to
> believe that this should ideally be avoided I'd like to hear that. If
> you feel
> strongly though this should be a feature I would like to know why.
There are multiple mapping interfaces, and overlapping can happen among
them as well. For instance, remap_pfn_range() (and
io_remap_pfn_range(), which is the same as remap_pfn_range() on x86)
creates a mapping to user space. The same physical ranges may be
mapped to kernel and user spaces. /dev/mem is one example that may
create a user space mapping to a physical address that is already
mapped with ioremap() by other module. pmem and DAX also create
mappings to the same NVDIMM ranges. DAX calls vm_insert_mixed(), which
is particularly a problematic since vm_insert_mixed() does not verify
aliasing. ioremap() and remap_pfn_range() call reserve_memtype() to
verify aliasing on x86. reserve_memtype() is x86-specific and there is
no arch-generic wrapper for such check. I think DAX could get a cache
type from pmem to keep them in sync, though.
Thanks,
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-07 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-22 8:24 [PATCH v5 0/6] pmem api, generic ioremap_cache, and memremap Dan Williams
2015-06-22 8:24 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] arch, drivers: don't include <asm/io.h> directly, use <linux/io.h> instead Dan Williams
2015-06-22 16:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-22 8:24 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] arch: unify ioremap prototypes and macro aliases Dan Williams
2015-06-22 16:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-22 17:12 ` Dan Williams
2015-06-23 10:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-23 15:04 ` Dan Williams
2015-06-24 12:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-30 22:57 ` Dan Williams
2015-07-01 6:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-07-01 6:55 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-01 6:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-07-01 7:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-01 7:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-07-07 9:50 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-07-07 10:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-07-07 10:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-07 16:07 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-07-07 23:10 ` Toshi Kani [this message]
2015-07-09 1:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-07-09 23:43 ` Toshi Kani
2015-07-01 8:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-07-01 16:47 ` Dan Williams
2015-07-09 18:54 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-06-22 8:24 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] cleanup IORESOURCE_CACHEABLE vs ioremap() Dan Williams
2015-06-22 8:24 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] devm: fix ioremap_cache() usage Dan Williams
2015-06-22 8:24 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] arch: introduce memremap_cache() and memremap_wt() Dan Williams
2015-06-22 8:24 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] arch, x86: pmem api for ensuring durability of persistent memory updates Dan Williams
2015-06-22 16:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-22 17:51 ` Dan Williams
2015-06-23 10:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-23 10:39 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-06-24 12:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-24 12:35 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1436310658.3214.85.camel@hp.com \
--to=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mcgrof@do-not-panic.com \
--cc=mcgrof@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox