From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dean Nelson <dnelson@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Jin Dongming <jin.dongming@np.css.fujitsu.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/memory-failure: call shake_page() when error hits thp tail page
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 07:25:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1429082714-26115-1-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> (raw)
Currently memory_failure() calls shake_page() to sweep pages out from pcplists
only when the victim page is 4kB LRU page or thp head page. But we should do
this for a thp tail page too.
Consider that a memory error hits a thp tail page whose head page is on a
pcplist when memory_failure() runs. Then, the current kernel skips shake_pages()
part, so hwpoison_user_mappings() returns without calling split_huge_page() nor
try_to_unmap() because PageLRU of the thp head is still cleared due to the skip
of shake_page().
As a result, me_huge_page() runs for the thp, which is a broken behavior.
This patch fixes this problem by calling shake_page() for thp tail case.
Fixes: 385de35722c9 ("thp: allow a hwpoisoned head page to be put back to LRU")
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.4+
---
mm/memory-failure.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git v4.0.orig/mm/memory-failure.c v4.0/mm/memory-failure.c
index d487f8dc6d39..2cc1d578144b 100644
--- v4.0.orig/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ v4.0/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -1141,10 +1141,10 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int trapno, int flags)
* The check (unnecessarily) ignores LRU pages being isolated and
* walked by the page reclaim code, however that's not a big loss.
*/
- if (!PageHuge(p) && !PageTransTail(p)) {
- if (!PageLRU(p))
- shake_page(p, 0);
- if (!PageLRU(p)) {
+ if (!PageHuge(p)) {
+ if (!PageLRU(hpage))
+ shake_page(hpage, 0);
+ if (!PageLRU(hpage)) {
/*
* shake_page could have turned it free.
*/
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2015-04-15 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-15 7:25 Naoya Horiguchi [this message]
2015-04-15 14:22 ` Andi Kleen
2015-04-16 13:49 ` Dean Nelson
2015-04-20 21:30 ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-21 8:47 ` Naoya Horiguchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1429082714-26115-1-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--to=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dnelson@redhat.com \
--cc=jin.dongming@np.css.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox