From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3DF56B0032 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:50:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: by wixw10 with SMTP id w10so31495883wix.0 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 07:50:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.suse.de (cantor2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c13si16546906wik.53.2015.03.16.07.50.24 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Mar 2015 07:50:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1426517419.28068.118.camel@stgolabs.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: rcu-protected get_mm_exe_file() From: Davidlohr Bueso Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 07:50:19 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20150316140720.GA1859@redhat.com> References: <20150316131257.32340.36600.stgit@buzz> <20150316140720.GA1859@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 15:07 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > 3. and we can remove down_write(mmap_sem) from prctl paths. > > Actually we can do this even without xchg() above, but we might > want to kill MMF_EXE_FILE_CHANGED and test_and_set_bit() check. Yeah I was waiting for security folks input about this, otherwise this still doesn't do it for me as we still have to deal with mmap_sem. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org