From: Shachar Raindel <raindel@mellanox.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, mgorman@suse.de,
riel@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com, matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
haggaie@mellanox.com, aarcange@redhat.com, pfeiner@google.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, sagig@mellanox.com, walken@google.com,
raindel@mellanox.com, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V4 4/4] mm: Refactor do_wp_page handling of shared vma into a function
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 14:47:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1424609241-20106-5-git-send-email-raindel@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424609241-20106-1-git-send-email-raindel@mellanox.com>
The do_wp_page function is extremely long. Extract the logic for
handling a page belonging to a shared vma into a function of its own.
This helps the readability of the code, without doing any functional
change in it.
Signed-off-by: Shachar Raindel <raindel@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Haggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
---
mm/memory.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 370aeec..3bf05a0 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2182,6 +2182,51 @@ oom:
return VM_FAULT_OOM;
}
+static int wp_page_shared(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ unsigned long address, pte_t *page_table,
+ pmd_t *pmd, spinlock_t *ptl, pte_t orig_pte,
+ struct page *old_page)
+ __releases(ptl)
+{
+ int page_mkwrite = 0;
+ page_cache_get(old_page);
+
+ /*
+ * Only catch write-faults on shared writable pages,
+ * read-only shared pages can get COWed by
+ * get_user_pages(.write=1, .force=1).
+ */
+ if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->page_mkwrite) {
+ int tmp;
+
+ pte_unmap_unlock(page_table, ptl);
+ tmp = do_page_mkwrite(vma, old_page, address);
+ if (unlikely(!tmp || (tmp &
+ (VM_FAULT_ERROR | VM_FAULT_NOPAGE)))) {
+ page_cache_release(old_page);
+ return tmp;
+ }
+ /*
+ * Since we dropped the lock we need to revalidate
+ * the PTE as someone else may have changed it. If
+ * they did, we just return, as we can count on the
+ * MMU to tell us if they didn't also make it writable.
+ */
+ page_table = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address,
+ &ptl);
+ if (!pte_same(*page_table, orig_pte)) {
+ unlock_page(old_page);
+ pte_unmap_unlock(page_table, ptl);
+ page_cache_release(old_page);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ page_mkwrite = 1;
+ }
+
+ return wp_page_reuse(mm, vma, address, page_table, ptl,
+ orig_pte, old_page, 1, page_mkwrite, 1);
+}
+
/*
* This routine handles present pages, when users try to write
* to a shared page. It is done by copying the page to a new address
@@ -2260,43 +2305,8 @@ static int do_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unlock_page(old_page);
} else if (unlikely((vma->vm_flags & (VM_WRITE|VM_SHARED)) ==
(VM_WRITE|VM_SHARED))) {
- int page_mkwrite = 0;
- page_cache_get(old_page);
-
- /*
- * Only catch write-faults on shared writable pages,
- * read-only shared pages can get COWed by
- * get_user_pages(.write=1, .force=1).
- */
- if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->page_mkwrite) {
- int tmp;
-
- pte_unmap_unlock(page_table, ptl);
- tmp = do_page_mkwrite(vma, old_page, address);
- if (unlikely(!tmp || (tmp &
- (VM_FAULT_ERROR | VM_FAULT_NOPAGE)))) {
- page_cache_release(old_page);
- return tmp;
- }
- /*
- * Since we dropped the lock we need to revalidate
- * the PTE as someone else may have changed it. If
- * they did, we just return, as we can count on the
- * MMU to tell us if they didn't also make it writable.
- */
- page_table = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address,
- &ptl);
- if (!pte_same(*page_table, orig_pte)) {
- unlock_page(old_page);
- pte_unmap_unlock(page_table, ptl);
- page_cache_release(old_page);
- return 0;
- }
- page_mkwrite = 1;
- }
-
- return wp_page_reuse(mm, vma, address, page_table, ptl,
- orig_pte, old_page, 1, page_mkwrite, 1);
+ return wp_page_shared(mm, vma, address, page_table, pmd,
+ ptl, orig_pte, old_page);
}
/*
--
1.7.11.2
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-22 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-22 12:47 [PATCH V4 0/4] Refactor do_wp_page, no functional change Shachar Raindel
2015-02-22 12:47 ` [PATCH V4 1/4] mm: Refactor do_wp_page, extract the reuse case Shachar Raindel
2015-02-22 13:09 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-02-22 12:47 ` [PATCH V4 2/4] mm: Refactor do_wp_page - rewrite the unlock flow Shachar Raindel
2015-02-22 13:19 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-02-22 12:47 ` [PATCH V4 3/4] mm: refactor do_wp_page, extract the page copy flow Shachar Raindel
2015-02-22 13:24 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-02-22 12:47 ` Shachar Raindel [this message]
2015-02-22 13:28 ` [PATCH V4 4/4] mm: Refactor do_wp_page handling of shared vma into a function Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1424609241-20106-5-git-send-email-raindel@mellanox.com \
--to=raindel@mellanox.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=haggaie@mellanox.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=pfeiner@google.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=sagig@mellanox.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox